[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 1]
[Revised as of April 1, 2003]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 26CFR1.46-6]

[Page 260-267]
 
                       TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
 
     CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
 
PART 1--INCOME TAXES--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 1.46-6  Limitation in case of certain regulated companies.

    (a) In general--(1) Scope of section. This section does not reflect 
amendments made to section 46 after enactment of the Revenue Act of 
1971, other than the redesignation of section 46(e) as section 46(f) by 
the Tax Reduction Act of 1975.
    (2) Disallowance of credit. Under section 46(f), a credit otherwise 
allowable under section 38 (``credit'') will be disallowed in certain 
cases with respect to ``section 46(f) property'' as defined in paragraph 
(b)(1) of this section. Paragraph (f) of this section describes 
circumstances under which a determination put into effect by a 
regulatory body will result in the disallowance of the credit. Such a 
determination will result in a disallowance only if section 46(f) (1) or 
(2) applies to such property and such determination affects the 
taxpayer's cost of service or rate base in a manner inconsistent with 
section 46(f) (1) or (2) (whichever is applicable).
    (3) General rules. The provisions of section 46(f) (1) and (2) are 
limitations on the treatment of the credit for ratemaking purposes and 
for purposes of the taxpayer's regulated books of account only. Under 
the provisions of section 46(f)(1), the credit may not be flowed through 
to income (i.e., used to reduce taxpayer's cost of service) but in 
certain circumstances may be used to reduce rate base (provided that 
such reduction is restored not less rapidly than ratably). If an 
election is made under section 46(f)(2), the credit may be flowed 
through to income (but not more rapidly than ratably) and there may not 
be any reduction in rate base. If an election is made under section 
46(f)(3), none of the limitations of section 46(f) (1) or (2) apply to 
certain section 46(f) property of the taxpayer. Thus, under the 
provisions of section 46(f)(3), no credit is disallowed if the credit is 
treated in any manner for ratemaking purposes, including any manner of 
treatment permitted under the limitations of section 46(f) (1) or (2).
    (4) Elections. For rules relating to the manner of making, on or 
before March 9, 1972, the three elections listed in section 46(f) (1), 
(2), and (3), see 26 CFR

[[Page 261]]

12.3. For rules relating to the application of such elections, see 
paragraph (h) of this section.
    (5) Cross references. For rules with respect to the treatment of 
corporate reorganizations, asset acquisitions, and taxpayers subject to 
the jurisdiction of more than one regulatory body, etc., see paragraph 
(j) of this section.
    (6) Nonapplication of prior law. Under section 105 (e) of the 
Revenue Act of 1971, section 203 (e) of the Revenue Act of 1964, 78 
Stat. 35, does not apply to section 46(f) property.
    (b) Definitions. For purposes of this section, the following 
definitions apply:
    (1) Section 46(f) property. ``Section 46(f) property'' is property 
described in section 50 that is--
    (i) Public utility property within the meaning of section 
46(c)(3)(B) (other than nonregulated communication property described in 
Sec. 1.46-3(g)(2)(iv)) or
    (ii) Property used predominantly in the trade or business of the 
furnishing or sale of steam through a local distribution system or of 
the transportation of gas or steam by pipeline, if the rates for the 
trade or business are regulated within the meaning of Sec. 1.46-
3(g)(2)(iii).

For purposes of determining whether property is used predominantly in 
the trade or business of transportation of gas by pipeline (or of 
transportation of gas by pipeline and of furnishing or sale of gas 
through a local distribution system), the rules prescribed in Sec. 1.46-
3(g)(4) apply except that accounts 365 through 371 inclusive 
(Transmission Plant) are added to the accounts listed in Sec. 1.46-
3(g)(4)(i).
    (2) Cost of service. (i)(A) For purposes of this section, ``cost of 
service'' is the amount required by a taxpayer to provide regulated 
goods or services. Cost of service includes operating expenses 
(including salaries, cost of materials, etc.) maintenance expenses, 
depreciation expenses, tax expenses, and interest expenses. For purposes 
of this section, any effect on a taxpayer's permitted return on 
investment that results from a reduction in the taxpayer's rate base 
does not constitute a reduction in cost of service, even though, as a 
technical ratemaking term, ``cost of service'' ordinarily includes a 
permitted return on investment. In addition, taking into account a 
deduction for the additional interest that the taxpayer would pay or 
accrue if the credit were unavailable in determining Federal income tax 
expense (``synchronization of interest'') does not constitute a 
reduction in cost of service for purposes of section 46(f)(2). This 
adjustment to Federal income tax expense may be taken into account in 
determining cost of service for the regulated accounting period or 
periods that include the taxable year to which the adjustment relates or 
for any subsequent regulated accounting period.
    (B) See paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(B) of this section for rules relating 
to the amount of additional interest that the taxpayer would pay or 
accrue if the credit were unavailable.
    (ii) In determining whether, or to what extent, a credit has been 
used to reduce cost of service, reference shall be made to any 
accounting treatment that affects cost of service. Examples of such 
treatment include reducing by all or a portion of the credit the amount 
of Federal income tax expense taken into account for ratemaking purposes 
and reducing the depreciable bases of property by all or a portion of 
the credit for ratemaking purposes.
    (3) Rate base. (i) For purposes of this section, ``rate base'' is 
the monetary amount that is multiplied by a rate of return to determine 
the permitted return on investment.
    (ii)(A) In determining whether, or to what extent, a credit has been 
used to reduce rate base, reference shall be made to any accounting 
treatment that affects rate base. In addition, in those cases in which 
the rate of return is based on the taxpayer's cost of capital, reference 
shall be made to any accounting treatment that reduces the permitted 
return on investment by treating the credit less favorably than the 
capital that would have been provided if the credit were unavailable. 
Thus, the credit may not be assigned a ``cost of capital'' rate that is 
less than the overall cost of capital rate, determined on the basis of a 
weighted average, for the capital that would have been provided if the 
credit were unavailable.

[[Page 262]]

    (B) For purposes of determining the cost of capital rate assigned to 
the credit and the amount of additional interest that the taxpayer would 
pay or accrue, the composition of the capital that would have been 
provided if the credit were unavailable may be determined--
    (1) On the basis of all the relevant facts and circumstances; or
    (2) By assuming for both such purposes that such capital would be 
provided solely by common shareholders, preferred shareholders, and 
long-term creditors in the same proportions and at the same rates of 
return as the capital actually provided to the taxpayer by such 
shareholders and creditors.

For purposes of this section, capital provided by long-term creditors 
does not include deferred taxes as described in section 167(e)(3)(G) or 
168(e)(3)(B)(ii).
    (C) If a taxpayer's overall rate of return is based on a deemed or 
hypothetical capital structure, paragraph (b)(3)(ii)(B) of this section 
shall be applied by treating the deemed or hypothetical capital as if it 
were the capital actually provided to the taxpayer and determining the 
composition of the capital that would have been provided if the credit 
were unavailable in a manner consistent with such treatment.
    (iii) Whether, or to what extent, a credit has been used to reduce 
rate base for any period to which pre-June 23, 1986 rates apply will be 
determined under 26 CFR 1.46-6(b) (3) and (4) (revised as of April 1, 
1985) if such a determination avoids disallowance of a credit that would 
be disallowed under paragraph (b)(3)(ii) or (4)(ii) of this section. For 
this purpose, a period of which pre-June 23, 1986 rates apply is any 
period for which the effect of the credit on rate base for ratemaking 
purposes is established under a determination put into effect (within 
the meaning of paragraph (f) of this section) before June 23, 1986.
    (4) Indirect reductions to cost of service or rate base. (i) Cost of 
service or rate base is also considered to have been reduced by reason 
of all or a portion of a credit if such reduction is made in an indirect 
manner.
    (ii) One type of such indirect reduction is any ratemaking decision 
in which the credit is treated as operating income (subject to 
ratemaking regulation) or is treated less favorably than the capital 
that would have been provided if the credit were unavailable. For 
example, if the credit is accounted for as nonoperating income on a 
company's regulated books of account but a ratemaking decision has the 
effect of treating the credit as operating income in determining rate of 
return to common shareholders, then cost of service has been indirectly 
reduced by reason of the credit.
    (iii) A second type of indirect reduction is any ratemaking decision 
intended to achieve an effect similar to a direct reduction to cost of 
service or rate base. In determining whether a ratemaking decision is 
intended to achieve this effect, consideration is given to all the 
relevant facts and circumstances of each case, including, but not 
limited to--
    (A) The record of the proceeding,
    (B) The regulatory body's orders or opinions (including any 
dissenting views), and
    (C) The anticipated effect of the ratemaking decision on the 
company's revenues in comparison to a direct reduction to cost of 
service or rate base by reason of the investment tax credits available 
to the regulated company.
    (iv) This paragraph (b)(4)(iv) describes a situation that is not an 
indirect reduction to cost of service or rate base by reason of all or a 
portion of a credit. The ratemaking treatment of credits may affect the 
financial condition of a company, including the company's ability to 
attract new capital, the cost of that capital, the company's future 
financial requirements, the market price of the company's securities, 
and the degree of risk attributable to investment in those securities. 
The financial condition may be reflected in certain customary financial 
indicators such as the comparative capital structure of the company, 
coverage ratios, price/earnings ratios, and price/book ratios. Under the 
facts and circumstances test of paragraph (b)(4)(iii) of this section, 
the consideration of a company's financial condition by a regulatory 
body is not an indirect reduction to cost of service or rate base, even 
though such condition, as affected by the ratemaking treatment of the

[[Page 263]]

company's investment tax credits, is considered in the development of a 
reasonable rate of return on common shareholders' investment.
    (c) General rule--(1) In general. Section 46(f)(1) applies to all of 
the taxpayer's section 46(f) property except property to which an 
election under section 46(f) (2) or (3) applies. Under section 46(f)(1), 
the credit for the taxpayer's section 46(f) property will be disallowed 
if--
    (i) The taxpayer's cost of service for ratemaking purposes is 
reduced by reason of any portion of such credit, or
    (ii) The taxpayer's rate base is reduced by reason of any portion of 
the credit and such reduction in rate base is not restored or is 
restored less rapidly than ratably within the meaning of paragraph (g) 
of this section.
    (2) Insufficient natural domestic supply. The provisions of 
paragraph (c)(1)(ii) of this section shall not apply to permit any 
reduction in taxpayer's rate base with respect to its ``short supply 
property'' if it made an election under the last sentence of section 
46(f)(1) on or before March 9, 1972.
    (3) Short supply property. For purposes of this section, section 
46(f) property is ``short supply property'' if--
    (i) The property is described in paragraph (b)(1)(ii) of this 
section,
    (ii) The regulatory body described in section 46(c)(3)(B) that has 
jurisdiction for ratemaking purposes with respect to such trade or 
business is an agency or instrumentality of the United States, and
    (iii) This regulatory body makes a short supply determination and 
the determination is in effect on the date such property is placed in 
service.
    (4) Short supply determination. A short supply determination is made 
or revoked on the date of its publication in the Federal Register. It is 
a determination that the natural domestic supply of gas or steam is 
insufficient to meet the present and future requirements of the domestic 
economy.
    (5) Dates short supply determination in effect. (i) A short supply 
determination is considered to be in effect with respect to section 
46(f) property placed in service at any time before the determination is 
revoked. However, a short supply determination made after June 20, 1979 
is not considered to be in effect with respect to section 46(f) property 
placed in service before such determination was made.
    (d) Special rule for ratable flow-through. If an election was made 
under section 46(f)(2) on or before March 9, 1972, section 46(f)(2) 
applies to all of the taxpayer's section 46(f) property except property 
to which an election under section 46(f)(3) applies. Under section 
46(f)(2), the credit for the taxpayer's section 46(f) property will be 
disallowed if--
    (1) The taxpayer's cost of service, for ratemaking purposes or in 
its regulated books of account, is reduced by more than a ratable 
portion of such credit within the meaning of paragraph (g) of this 
section or
    (2) The taxpayer's rate base is reduced by reason of any portion of 
such credit.
    (e) Flow-through property. If a taxpayer made an election under 
section 46(f)(3) on or before March 9, 1972, section 46(f) (1) and (2) 
do not apply to the taxpayer's section 46(f) property to which section 
167(l)(2)(C) applies. In the case of an election under section 46(f)(3), 
a credit will not be disallowed, notwithstanding a determination by a 
regulatory body having jurisdiction over such taxpayer that reduces the 
taxpayer's cost of service or rate base by reason of such credit. In 
general, section 167(l)(2)(C) applies to property with respect to which 
a taxpayer may use a flow-through method of accounting (within the 
meaning of section 167(l)(3)(H)) to take into account the allowance for 
depreciation under section 167(a). Section 167(l)(2)(C) applies to 
property even though the taxpayer does not use a flow-through method of 
accounting with respect to the property. Section 167(l)(2)(C) does not 
apply to property if the taxpayer can not use a flow-through method of 
accounting with respect to the property. For example, section 
167(l)(2)(C) does not apply to property with respect to which an 
election under section 167(l)(4)(A) applies. Thus, such property does 
not qualify for an election under section 46(f)(3).
    (f) Limitations--(1) In general. This paragraph provides rules 
relating to limitations on the disallowance of

[[Page 264]]

credits under section 46(f)(4). Key terms are defined in paragraphs (f) 
(7), (8), and (9) of this section.
    (2) Disallowance postponed. There is no disallowance of a credit 
before the first final inconsistent determination is put into effect for 
the taxpayer's section 46(f) property.
    (3) Time of disallowance. A credit is disallowed--
    (i) When the first final inconsistent determination is put into 
effect and
    (ii) When any inconsistent determination (whether or not final) is 
put into effect after the first final inconsistent determination is put 
into effect.
    (4) Credits disallowed. A credit is disallowed for section 46(f) 
property placed in service (within the meaning of Sec. 1.46-3(d)) by the 
taxpayer--
    (i) Before the date any inconsistent determination described in 
paragraph (f)(2) of this section is put into effect and
    (ii) On or after such date and before the date a subsequent 
consistent determination (whether or not final) is put into effect.
    (5) Barred years. No amount of credit for a taxable year is 
disallowed under paragraph (f)(3) of this section if, for such year, 
assessment of a deficiency is barred by any law or rule of law.
    (6) Notification and other requirements. The taxpayer shall notify 
the district director of a disallowance of a credit under paragraph 
(f)(3) of this section within 30 days of the date that the applicable 
determination is put into effect. In the case of such a disallowance, 
the taxpayer shall recompute its tax liability for any affected taxable 
year, and such recomputation shall be made in the form of an amended 
return where necessary.
    (7) Determinations. For purposes of this paragraph, the term 
``determination'' refers to a determination made with respect to section 
46(f) property (other than property to which an election under section 
46(f)(3) applies) by a regulatory body described in section 46(c)(3)(B) 
that determines the effect of the credit--
    (i) For purposes of section 46(f)(1), on the taxpayer's cost of 
service or rate base for ratemaking purposes or
    (ii) In the case of a taxpayer that made an election under section 
46(f)(2), on the taxpayer's cost of service, for ratemaking purposes or 
in its regulated books of account, or on the taxpayer's rate base for 
ratemaking purposes.

A regulatory body does not have to take affirmative action to make a 
determination. Thus, a regulatory body's failure to take action on a 
rate schedule filed by a taxpayer is a determination if the rates can be 
put into effect without further action by the regulatory body.
    (8) Types of determinations. For purposes of this paragraph--
    (i) The term ``inconsistent'' refers to a determination that is 
inconsistent with section 46(f) (1) or (2) (as the case may be). Thus, 
for example, a determination to reduce the taxpayer's cost of service by 
more than a ratable portion of the credit would be a determination that 
is inconsistent with section 46(f)(2). As a further example, such a 
determination would also be inconsistent if section 46(f)(1) applied 
because no reduction in cost of service is permitted under section 
46(f)(1).
    (ii) The term ``consistent'' refers to a determination that is 
consistent with section 46(f) (1) or (2) (as the case may be).
    (iii) The term ``final determination'' means a determination with 
respect to which all rights to appeal or to request a review, a 
rehearing, or a redetermination have been exhausted or have lapsed.
    (iv) The term ``first final inconsistent determination'' means the 
first final determination put into effect after December 10, 1971, that 
is inconsistent with section 46(f) (1) or (2) (as the case may be).
    (9) Put into effect. A determination is put into effect on the 
latter of--
    (i) The date it is issued (or, if a first final inconsistent 
determination, the date it becomes final) or
    (ii) The date it becomes operative.
    (10) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph may be illustrated 
by the following examples:

    Example 1. Corporation X, a calendar-year taxpayer engaged in a 
public utility activity is subject to the jurisdiction of regulatory 
body A. On September 15, 1971, X purchases

[[Page 265]]

section 46(f) property and places it in service on that date. For 1971, 
X takes the credit allowable by section 38 with respect to such 
property. X does not make any election permitted by section 46(f). On 
October 9, 1972, A makes a determination that X must account for the 
credit allowable under section 38 in a manner inconsistent with section 
46(f)(1). The determination, which was the first determination by A 
after December 10, 1971, becomes final on January 1, 1973, and holds 
that X must retroactively adjust the manner in which it accounted for 
the credit allowable under section 38 starting with the taxable year 
that began on January 1, 1972. Since, under the provisions of paragraph 
(f)(8) of this section, the determination by A is put into effect on 
January 1, 1973 (the date it becomes final), the credit is retroactively 
disallowed with respect to any of X's section 46(f) property placed in 
service before January 1, 1973, on any date which occurs during a 
taxable year with respect to which an assessment of a deficiency has not 
been barred by any law or rule of law. In addition, the credit is 
disallowed with respect to X's section 46(f) property placed in service 
on or after January 1, 1973, and before the date that a subsequent 
determination by A, which as to X is consistent with section 46(f)(1), 
is put into effect. Thus, X must amend its income tax return for 1971 to 
reflect the retroactive disallowance of the credit otherwise allowable 
under section 38 with respect to the section 46(f) property placed in 
service on September 15, 1971.
    Example 2. The facts are the same as in example 1, except that the 
first inconsistent determination by A becomes final on April 5, 1972, 
and requires X to account for the credit for all taxable years beginning 
on or after January 1, 1973, in a manner inconsistent with section 
46(f)(1). Under the provisions of paragraph (f)(8) of this section, the 
determination was put into effect on January 1, 1973 (the date it became 
operative). The result is the same as in example 1.
    Example 3. The facts are the same as in example 1, except that on 
June 1, 1975, A issues a determination that X shall retroactively 
account for the credit allowable by section 38 in a manner consistent 
with the provisions of section 46(f)(1) for taxable years beginning on 
or after January 1, 1971. The determination becomes final on January 5, 
1976, in the same form as originally issued. The result is the same as 
in example 1 with respect to property X places in service before June 1, 
1975. The credit is allowed with respect to property X places in service 
on or after June 1, 1975 (the date that the consistent determination is 
put into effect).

    (g) Ratable methods--(1) In general. Under this paragraph (g), rules 
are prescribed for purposes of determining whether or not, under section 
46(f)(1), a reduction in the taxpayer's rate base with respect to the 
credit is restored less rapidly than ratably and whether or not under 
section 46(f)(2) the taxpayer's cost of service for ratemaking purposes 
is reduced by more than a ratable portion of such credit.
    (2) Regulated depreciation expense. What is ``ratable'' is 
determined by considering the period of time actually used in computing 
the taxpayer's regulated depreciation expense for the property for which 
a credit is allowed. ``Regulated depreciation expense'' is the 
depreciation expense for the property used by a regulatory body for 
purposes of establishing the taxpayer's cost of service for ratemaking 
purposes. Such period of time shall be expressed in units of years (or 
shorter periods), units of production, or machine hours and shall be 
determined in accordance with the individual useful life system or 
composite (or other group asset) account system actually used in 
computing the taxpayer's regulated depreciation expense. A method of 
restoring, or reducing, is ratable if the amount to be restored to rate 
base, or to reduce cost of service (as the case may be), is allocated 
ratably in proportion to the number of such units. Thus, for example, 
assume that the regulated depreciation expense is computed under the 
straight line method by applying a composite annual percentage rate to 
``original cost'' (as defined for purposes of computing regulated 
depreciation expense). If, with respect to an item of section 46(f) 
property, the amount to be restored annually to rate base is computed by 
applying a composite annual percentage rate to the amount by which the 
rate base was reduced, then the restoration is ratable. Similarly, if 
cost of service is reduced annually by an amount computed by applying a 
composite annual percentage rate to the amount of the credit, cost of 
service is reduced by a ratable portion. If such composite annual 
percenage rate were revised for purposes of computing regulated 
depreciation expense beginning with a particular accounting period, the 
computation of ratable restoration or ratable portion (as the case may 
be) must also be revised beginning with such period. A composite annual 
percentage

[[Page 266]]

rate is determined solely by reference to the period of time actually 
used by the taxpayer in computing its regulated depreciation expense 
without reduction for salvage or other items such as over and under 
accruals. A composite annual percentage rate determined by taking into 
account salvage value or other items shall be considered to be ratable 
in the case of a determination (whether or not final) issued before 
March 22, 1979, and any rate order (whether or not final) that is 
entered into before June 20, 1979, in response to a rate case filed 
before April 23, 1979. For this purpose, the term ``rate order'' does 
not include an order by a regulatory body that perfunctorily adopts 
rates as filed if such rates are suspended or subject to rebate.
    (h) Elections--(1) Applicability of elections. (i) Any election 
under section 46(f) applies to all of the taxpayer's property eligible 
for the election, whether or not the taxpayer is regulated by more than 
one regulatory body.
    (ii) Section 46(f)(1) applies to all of the taxpayer's section 46(f) 
property in the absence of an election under either section 46(f) (2) or 
(3). If an election is made under section 46(f)(2), section 46(f)(1) 
does not apply to any of the taxpayer's section 46(f) property.
    (iii) An election made under the last sentence of section 46(f)(1) 
applies to that portion of the taxpayer's section 46(f) property to 
which section 46(f)(1) applies and which is short supply property within 
the meaning of paragraph (c)(2) of this section.
    (iv) If a taxpayer makes an election under section 46(f)(2) and 
makes no election under section 46(f)(3), the election under section 
46(f)(2) applies to all of the taxpayer's section 46(f) property.
    (v) If a taxpayer makes an election under section 46(f)(3), such 
election applies to all of the taxpayer's section 46(f) property to 
which section 167(l)(2)(C) applies. Section 46(f) (1) or (2) (as the 
case may be) applies to that portion of the taxpayer's section 46(f) 
property that is not property to which section 167(f)(2)(C) applies. 
Thus, for example, if a taxpayer makes an election under section 
46(f)(2) and also makes an election under section 46(f)(3), section 
46(f)(3) applies to all of the taxpayer's section 46(f) property to 
which section 167(l)(2)(C) applies, and section 46(f)(2) applies to the 
remainder of the taxpayer's section 46(f) property.
    (2) Method of making elections. See 26 CFR 12.3 for rules relating 
to the method of making the elections described in section 46(f) (1), 
(2), or (3).
    (i) [Reserved]
    (j) Reorganizations, asset acquisitions, multiple regulation, etc.--
(1) Taxpayers not entirely subject to jurisdiction of one regulatory 
body. (i) If a taxpayer is required by a regulatory body having 
jurisdiction over less than all of its property to account for the 
credit under a determination that is inconsistent with section 46(f) (1) 
or (2) (as the case may be), such credit shall be disallowed only with 
respect to property subject to the jurisdiction of such regulatory body.
    (ii) For purposes of this paragraph (j), a regulatory body is 
considered to have jurisdiction over property of a taxpayer if the 
property is included in the rate base for which the regulatory body 
determines an allowable rate of return for ratemaking purposes or if 
expenses with respect to the property are included in cost of service as 
determined by the regulatory body for ratemaking purposes. For example, 
if regulatory body A, having jurisdiction over 60 percent of an item of 
corporation X's section 46(f) property, makes a determination which is 
inconsistent with section 46(f), and if regulatory body B, having 
jurisdiction over the remaining 40 percent of such item of property, 
makes a consistent determination (or if the remaining 40 percent is not 
subject to the jurisdiction of any regulatory body), then 60 percent of 
the credit for such item will be disallowed. For a further example, if 
regulatory body A, having jurisdiction over 60 percent of X's section 
46(f) property, has jurisdiction over 100 percent of a particular 
generator, 100 percent of the credit for such generator will be 
disallowed.
    (iii) For rules which provide that the 3 elections under section 
46(f) may not be made with respect to less than all of the taxpayer's 
property eligible for the

[[Page 267]]

election, see paragraph (h)(1)(i) of this section.

[T.D. 7602, 44 FR 17668, Mar. 23, 1979, as amended by T.D. 8089, 51 FR 
18777, May 22, 1986]