[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 2]
[Revised as of April 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 26CFR1.112-1]

[Page 484-489]
 
                       TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
 
    CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 
                               (CONTINUED)
 
PART 1_INCOME TAXES--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 1.112-1  Combat zone compensation of members of the Armed Forces.

    (a) Combat zone compensation exclusion--(1) Amount excluded. In 
addition to the exemptions and credits otherwise applicable, section 112 
excludes from gross income the following compensation of members of the 
Armed Forces:
    (i) Enlisted personnel. Compensation received for active service as 
a member below the grade of commissioned officer in the Armed Forces of 
the United States for any month during any part of which the member 
served in a combat zone or was hospitalized at any place as a result of 
wounds, disease, or injury incurred while serving in the combat zone.
    (ii) Commissioned officers. Compensation not exceeding the monthly 
dollar limit received for active service as a commissioned officer in 
the Armed Forces of the United States for any month during any part of 
which the officer served in a combat zone or was hospitalized at any 
place as a result of wounds, disease, or injury incurred while serving 
in the combat zone. The monthly dollar limit is the monthly amount 
excludable from the officer's income under section 112(b) as amended. 
Beginning in 1966, the monthly dollar limit for periods of active 
service after 1965 became $500. As of September 10, 1993, the monthly 
dollar limit continues to be $500.
    (2) Time limits on exclusion during hospitalization. Compensation 
received for service for any month of hospitalization that begins more 
than 2 years after the date specified by the President in an Executive 
Order as the date of the termination of combatant activities in the 
combat zone cannot be excluded under section 112. Furthermore, 
compensation received while hospitalized after January 1978 for wounds, 
disease, or injury incurred in the Vietnam combat zone designated by 
Executive Order 11216 cannot be excluded under section 112.
    (3) Special terms. A commissioned warrant officer is not a 
commissioned officer under section 112(b) and is entitled to the 
exclusion allowed to enlisted personnel under section 112(a). 
Compensation, for the purpose of section 112, does not include pensions 
and retirement pay. Armed Forces of the United States is defined (and 
members of the Armed Forces are described) in section 7701(a)(15).
    (4) Military compensation only. Only compensation paid by the Armed

[[Page 485]]

Forces of the United States to members of the Armed Forces can be 
excluded under section 112, except for compensation paid by an agency or 
instrumentality of the United States or by an international organization 
to a member of the Armed Forces whose military active duty status 
continues during the member's assignment to the agency or 
instrumentality or organization on official detail. Compensation paid by 
other employers (whether private enterprises or governmental entities) 
to members of the Armed Forces cannot be excluded under section 112 even 
if the payment is made to supplement the member's military compensation 
or is labeled by the employer as compensation for active service in the 
Armed Forces of the United States. Compensation paid to civilian 
employees of the federal government, including civilian employees of the 
Armed Forces, cannot be excluded under section 112, except as provided 
in section 112(d)(2) (which extends the exclusion to compensation of 
civilian employees of the federal government in missing status due to 
the Vietnam conflict).
    (b) Service in combat zone--(1) Active service. The exclusion under 
section 112 applies only if active service is performed in a combat 
zone. A member of the Armed Forces is in active service if the member is 
actually serving in the Armed Forces of the United States. Periods 
during which a member of the Armed Forces is absent from duty on account 
of sickness, wounds, leave, internment by the enemy, or other lawful 
cause are periods of active service. A member of the Armed Forces in 
active service in a combat zone who becomes a prisoner of war or missing 
in action in the combat zone is deemed, for the purpose of section 112, 
to continue in active service in the combat zone for the period for 
which the member is treated as a prisoner of war or as missing in action 
for military pay purposes.
    (2) Combat zone status. Except as provided in paragraphs (e) and (f) 
of this section, service is performed in a combat zone only if it is 
performed in an area which the President of the United States has 
designated by Executive Order, for the purpose of section 112, as an 
area in which Armed Forces of the United States are or have been engaged 
in combat, and only if it is performed on or after the date designated 
by the President by Executive Order as the date of the commencing of 
combatant activities in that zone and on or before the date designated 
by the President by Executive Order as the date of the termination of 
combatant activities in that zone.
    (3) Partial month service. If a member of the Armed Forces serves in 
a combat zone for any part of a month, the member is entitled to the 
exclusion for that month to the same extent as if the member has served 
in that zone for the entire month. If a member of the Armed Forces is 
hospitalized for a part of a month as a result of wounds, disease, or 
injury incurred while serving in that zone, the member is entitled to 
the exclusion for the entire month.
    (4) Payment time and place. The time and place of payment are 
irrelevant in considering whether compensation is excludable under 
section 112; rather, the time and place of the entitlement to 
compensation determine whether the compensation is excludable under 
section 112. Thus, compensation can be excluded under section 112 
whether or not it is received outside a combat zone, or while the 
recipient is hospitalized, or in a year different from that in which the 
service was rendered for which the compensation is paid, provided that 
the member's entitlement to the compensation fully accrued in a month 
during which the member served in the combat zone or was hospitalized as 
a result of wounds, disease, or injury incurred while serving in the 
combat zone. For this purpose, entitlement to compensation fully accrues 
upon the completion of all actions required of the member to receive the 
compensation. Compensation received by a member of the Armed Forces for 
services rendered while in active service can be excluded under section 
112 even though payment is received subsequent to discharge or release 
from active service. Compensation credited to a deceased member's 
account for a period subsequent to the established date of the member's 
death and received by the member's estate can be excluded from the gross 
income of the estate under section 112 to the same extent

[[Page 486]]

that it would have been excluded from the gross income of the member had 
the member lived and received the compensation.
    (5) Examples of combat zone compensation. The rules of this section 
are illustrated by the following examples:

    Example 1. On January 5, outside of a combat zone, an enlisted 
member received basic pay for active duty services performed from the 
preceding December 1 through December 31. On December 4 (and no other 
date), the member performed services within a combat zone. The member 
may exclude from income the entire payment received on January 5, 
although the member served in the combat zone only one day during 
December, received the payment outside of the combat zone, and received 
the payment in a year other than the year in which the combat zone 
services were performed.
    Example 2. From March through December, an enlisted member became 
entitled to 25 days of annual leave while serving in a combat zone. The 
member used all 25 days of leave in the following year. The member may 
exclude from income the compensation received for those 25 days, even if 
the member performs no services in the combat zone in the year the 
compensation is received.
    Example 3. From March through December, a commissioned officer 
became entitled to 25 days of annual leave while serving in a combat 
zone. During that period the officer also received basic pay of $1,000 
per month from which the officer excluded from income $500 per month 
(exhausting the monthly dollar limit under section 112 for that period). 
The officer used all 25 days of leave in the following year. The officer 
may not exclude from income any compensation received in the following 
year related to those 25 days of leave, since the officer had already 
excluded from income the maximum amount of combat zone compensation for 
the period in which the leave was earned.
    Example 4. In November, while serving in a combat zone, an enlisted 
member competing for a cash award submitted an employee suggestion. 
After November, the member neither served in a combat zone nor was 
hospitalized for wounds incurred in the combat zone. In June of the 
following year, the member's suggestion was selected as the winner of 
the competition and the award was paid. The award can be excluded from 
income as combat zone compensation although granted and received outside 
of the combat zone, since the member completed the necessary action to 
win the award (submission of the suggestion) in a month during which the 
member served in the combat zone.
    Example 5. In July, while serving in a combat zone, an enlisted 
member voluntarily reenlisted. After July, the member neither served in 
a combat zone nor was hospitalized for wounds incurred in the combat 
zone. In February of the following year, the member received a bonus as 
a result of the July reenlistment. The reenlistment bonus can be 
excluded from income as combat zone compensation although received 
outside of the combat zone, since the member completed the necessary 
action for entitlement to the reenlistment bonus in a month during which 
the member served in the combat zone.
    Example 6. In July, while serving outside a combat zone, an enlisted 
member voluntarily reenlisted. In February of the following year, the 
member, while performing services in a combat zone, received a bonus as 
a result of the July reenlistment. The reenlistment bonus cannot be 
excluded from income as combat zone compensation although received while 
serving in the combat zone, since the member completed the necessary 
action for entitlement to the reenlistment bonus in a month during which 
the member had neither served in the combat zone nor was hospitalized 
for wounds incurred while serving in a combat zone.

    (c) Hospitalization--(1) Presumption of combat zone injury. If an 
individual is hospitalized for wound, disease, or injury while serving 
in a combat zone, the wound, disease, or injury will be presumed to have 
been incurred while serving in a combat zone, unless the contrary 
clearly appears. In certain cases, however, a wound, disease, or injury 
may have been incurred while serving in a combat zone even though the 
individual was not hospitalized for it while so serving. In exceptional 
cases, a wound, disease, or injury will not have been incurred while 
serving in a combat zone even though the individual was hospitalized for 
it while so serving.
    (2) Length of hospitalization. An individual is hospitalized only 
until the date the individual is discharged from the hospital.
    (3) Examples of combat zone injury. The rules of this paragraph (c) 
are illustrated by the following examples:

    Example 1. An individual is hospitalized for a disease in the combat 
zone where the individual has been serving for three weeks. The 
incubation period of the disease is two to four weeks. The disease is 
incurred while serving in the combat zone.
    Example 2. The facts are the same as in Example 1 except that the 
incubation period of the disease is one year. The disease is not 
incurred while serving in the combat zone.

[[Page 487]]

    Example 3. A member of the Air Force, stationed outside the combat 
zone, is shot while participating in aerial combat over the combat zone, 
but is not hospitalized until returning to the home base. The injury is 
incurred while serving in a combat zone.
    Example 4. An individual is hospitalized for a disease three weeks 
after having departed from a combat zone. The incubation period of the 
disease is two to four weeks. The disease is incurred while serving in a 
combat zone.

    (d) Married members. The exclusion under section 112 applies without 
regard to the marital status of the recipient of the compensation. If 
both spouses meet the requirements of the statute, then each spouse is 
entitled to the benefit of an exclusion. In the case of a husband and 
wife domiciled in a State recognized for Federal income tax purposes as 
a community property State, any exclusion from gross income under 
section 112 operates before apportionment of the gross income of the 
spouses under community property law. For example, a husband and wife 
are domiciled in a community property State and the member spouse is 
entitled, as a commissioned officer, to the benefit of the exclusion 
under section 112(b) of $500 for each month. The member receives $7,899 
as compensation for active service for 3 months in a combat zone. Of 
that amount, $1,500 is excluded from gross income under section 112(b) 
and $6,399 is taken into account in determining the gross income of both 
spouses.
    (e) Service in area outside combat zone--(1) Combat zone treatment. 
For purposes of section 112, a member of the Armed Forces who performs 
military service in an area outside the area designated by Executive 
Order as a combat zone is deemed to serve in that combat zone while the 
member's service is in direct support of military operations in that 
zone and qualifies the member for the special pay for duty subject to 
hostile fire or imminent danger authorized under section 310 of title 37 
of the United States Code, as amended (37 U.S.C. 310) (hostile fire/
imminent danger pay).
    (2) Examples of combat zone treatment. The examples in this 
paragraph (e)(2) are based on the following circumstances: Certain 
areas, airspace, and adjacent waters are designated as a combat zone for 
purposes of section 112 as of May 1. Some members of the Armed Forces 
are stationed in the combat zone; others are stationed in two foreign 
countries outside the combat zone, named Nearby Country and Destination 
Country.

    Example 1. B is a member of an Armed Forces ground unit stationed in 
the combat zone. On May 31, B's unit crosses into Nearby Country. B 
performs military service in Nearby Country in direct support of the 
military operations in the combat zone from June 1 through June 8 that 
qualifies B for hostile fire/imminent danger pay. B does not return to 
the combat zone during June. B is deemed to serve in the combat zone 
from June 1 through June 8. Accordingly, B is entitled to the exclusion 
under section 112 for June. Of course, B is also entitled to the 
exclusion for any month (May, in this example) in which B actually 
served in the combat zone.
    Example 2. B is a member of an Armed Forces ground unit stationed in 
the combat zone. On May 31, B's unit crosses into Nearby Country. On 
June 1, B is wounded while performing military service in Nearby Country 
in direct support of the military operations in the combat zone that 
qualifies B for hostile fire/imminent danger pay. On June 2, B is 
transferred for treatment to a hospital in the United States. B is 
hospitalized from June through October for those wounds. B is deemed to 
have incurred the wounds while serving in the combat zone on June 1. 
Accordingly, B is entitled to the exclusion under section 112 for June 
through October. Of course, B is also entitled to the exclusion for any 
month (May, in this example) in which B actually served in the combat 
zone.
    Example 3. B is stationed in Nearby Country for the entire month of 
June as a member of a ground crew servicing combat aircraft operating in 
the combat zone. B's service in Nearby Country during June does not 
qualify B for hostile fire/imminent danger pay. Accordingly, B is not 
deemed to serve in the combat zone during June and is not entitled to 
the exclusion under section 112 for that month.
    Example 4. B is assigned to an air unit stationed in Nearby Country 
for the entire month of June. In June, members of air units of the Armed 
Forces stationed in Nearby Country fly combat and supply missions into 
and over Destination Country in direct support of military operations in 
the combat zone. B flies combat missions over Destination Country from 
Nearby Country from June 1 through June 8. B's service qualifies B for 
hostile fire/imminent danger pay. Accordingly, B is deemed to serve in 
the combat zone during June and is entitled to the exclusion under 
section 112. The result would

[[Page 488]]

be the same if B were to fly supply missions into Destination Country 
from Nearby Country in direct support of operations in the combat zone 
qualifying B for hostile fire/imminent danger pay.
    Example 5. Assigned to an air unit stationed in Nearby Country, B 
was killed in June when B's plane crashed on returning to the airbase in 
Nearby Country. B was performing military service in direct support of 
the military operations in the combat zone at the time of B's death. B's 
service also qualified B for hostile fire/imminent danger pay. B is 
deemed to have died while serving in the combat zone or to have died as 
a result of wounds, disease, or injury incurred while serving in the 
combat zone for purposes of section 692(a) and section 692(b) (providing 
relief from certain income taxes for members of the Armed Forces dying 
in a combat zone or as a result of wounds, disease, or injury incurred 
while serving in a combat zone) and section 2201 (providing relief from 
certain estate taxes for members of the Armed Forces dying in a combat 
zone or by reason of combat-zone-incurred wounds). The result would be 
the same if B's mission had been a supply mission instead of a combat 
mission.
    Example 6. In June, B was killed as a result of an off-duty 
automobile accident while leaving the airbase in Nearby Country shortly 
after returning from a mission over Destination Country. At the time of 
B's death, B was not performing military duty qualifying B for hostile 
fire/imminent danger pay. B is not deemed to have died while serving in 
the combat zone or to have died as the result of wounds, disease, or 
injury incurred while serving in the combat zone. Accordingly, B does 
not qualify for the benefits of section 692(a), section 692(b), or 
section 2201.
    Example 7. B performs military service in Nearby Country from June 1 
through June 8 in direct support of the military operations in the 
combat zone. Nearby Country is designated as an area in which members of 
the Armed Forces qualify for hostile fire/imminent danger pay due to 
imminent danger, even though members in Nearby Country are not subject 
to hostile fire. B is deemed to serve in the combat zone from June 1 
through June 8. Accordingly, B is entitled to the exclusion under 
section 112 for June.

    (f) Nonqualifying presence in combat zone--(1) Inapplicability of 
exclusion. The following members of the Armed Forces are not deemed to 
serve in a combat zone within the meaning of section 112(a)(1) or 
section 112(b)(1) or to be hospitalized as a result of wounds, disease, 
or injury incurred while serving in a combat zone within the meaning of 
section 112(a)(2) or section 112(b)(2)--
    (i) Members present in a combat zone while on leave from a duty 
station located outside a combat zone;
    (ii) Members who pass over or through a combat zone during the 
course of a trip between two points both of which lie outside a combat 
zone; or
    (iii) Members present in a combat zone solely for their own personal 
convenience.
    (2) Exceptions for temporary duty or special pay. Paragraph (f)(1) 
of this section does not apply to members of the Armed Forces who--
    (i) Are assigned on official temporary duty to a combat zone 
(including official temporary duty to the airspace of a combat zone); or
    (ii) Qualify for hostile fire/imminent danger pay.
    (3) Examples of nonqualifying presence and its exceptions. The 
examples in this paragraph (f)(3) are based on the following 
circumstances: Certain areas, airspace, and adjacent waters are 
designated as a combat zone for purposes of section 112 as of May 1. 
Some members of the Armed Forces are stationed in the combat zone; 
others are stationed in two foreign countries outside the combat zone, 
named Nearby Country and Destination Country.

    Example 1. B is a member of the Armed Forces assigned to a unit 
stationed in Nearby Country. On June 1, B voluntarily visits a city 
within the combat zone while on leave. B is not deemed to serve in a 
combat zone since B is present in a combat zone while on leave from a 
duty station located outside a combat zone.
    Example 2. B is a member of the Armed Forces assigned to a unit 
stationed in Nearby Country. During June, B takes authorized leave and 
elects to spend the leave period by visiting a city in the combat zone. 
While on leave in the combat zone, B is subject to hostile fire 
qualifying B for hostile fire/imminent danger pay. Although B is present 
in the combat zone while on leave from a duty station outside the combat 
zone, B qualifies for the exclusion under section 112 because B 
qualifies for hostile fire/imminent danger pay while in the combat zone.
    Example 3. B is a member of the Armed Forces assigned to a ground 
unit stationed in the combat zone. During June, B takes authorized leave 
and elects to spend the leave period in the combat zone. B is not on 
leave from a duty station located outside a combat

[[Page 489]]

zone, nor is B present in a combat zone solely for B's own personal 
convenience. Accordingly, B's combat zone tax benefits continue while B 
is on leave in the combat zone.
    Example 4. B is assigned as a navigator to an air unit stationed in 
Nearby Country. On June 4, during the course of a flight between B's 
home base in Nearby Country and another base in Destination Country, the 
aircraft on which B serves as a navigator flies over the combat zone. B 
is not on official temporary duty to the airspace of the combat zone and 
does not qualify for hostile fire/imminent danger pay as a result of the 
flight. Accordingly, B is not deemed to serve in a combat zone since B 
passes over the combat zone during the course of a trip between two 
points both of which lie outside the combat zone without either being on 
official temporary duty to the combat zone or qualifying for hostile 
fire/imminent danger pay.
    Example 5. B is a member of the Armed Forces assigned to a unit 
stationed in Nearby Country. B enters the combat zone on a 3-day pass. B 
is not on official temporary duty and does not qualify for hostile fire/
imminent danger pay while present in the combat zone. Accordingly, B is 
not deemed to serve in a combat zone since B is present in the combat 
zone solely for B's own personal convenience.
    Example 6. B, stationed in Nearby Country, is a military courier 
assigned on official temporary duty to deliver military pouches in the 
combat zone and in Destination Country. On June 1, B arrives in the 
combat zone from Nearby Country, and on June 2, B departs for 
Destination Country. Although B passes through the combat zone during 
the course of a trip between two points outside the combat zone, B is 
nevertheless deemed to serve in a combat zone while in the combat zone 
because B is assigned to the combat zone on official temporary duty.
    Example 7. B is a member of an Armed Forces ground unit stationed in 
Nearby Country. On June 1, B took authorized leave and elected to spend 
the leave period by visiting a city in the combat zone. On June 2, while 
on leave in the combat zone, B was wounded by hostile fire qualifying B 
for hostile fire/imminent danger pay. On June 3, B was transferred for 
treatment to a hospital in the United States. B is hospitalized from 
June through October for those wounds. Although B was present in the 
combat zone while on leave from a duty station outside the combat zone, 
B is deemed to have incurred the wounds while serving in the combat zone 
on June 2, because B qualified for hostile fire/imminent danger pay 
while in the combat zone. Accordingly, B is entitled to the exclusion 
under section 112 for June through October.
    Example 8. The facts are the same as in Example 7 except that B dies 
on September 1 as a result of the wounds incurred in the combat zone. B 
is deemed to have died as a result of wounds, disease, or injury 
incurred while serving in the combat zone for purposes of section 692(a) 
and section 692(b) (providing relief from certain income taxes for 
members of the Armed Forces dying in a combat zone or as a result of 
wounds, disease, or injury incurred while serving in a combat zone) and 
section 2201 (providing relief from certain estate taxes for members of 
the Armed Forces dying in a combat zone or by reason of combat-zone-
incurred wounds).

[T.D. 8489, 58 FR 47640, Sept. 10, 1993]