[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 2]
[Revised as of April 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 26CFR1.141-8]

[Page 657-659]
 
                       TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
 
    CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 
                               (CONTINUED)
 
PART 1_INCOME TAXES--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 1.141-8  $15 million limitation for output facilities.

    (a) In general--(1) General rule. Section 141(b)(4) provides a 
special private activity bond limitation (the $15 million output 
limitation) for issues 5 percent or more of the proceeds of which are to 
be used to finance output facilities (other than a facility for the 
furnishing of water). Under this rule, an issue consists of private 
activity bonds under the private business tests of section 141(b)(1) and 
(2) if the nonqualified amount with respect to output facilities 
financed by the proceeds of the issue exceeds $15 million. The $15 
million output limitation applies in addition to the private business 
tests of section 141(b)(1) and (2). Under section 141(b)(4) and 
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, the $15 million output limitation is 
reduced in certain cases. Specifically, an issue meets the test in 
section 141(b)(4) if both of the following tests are met:
    (i) More than $15 million of the proceeds of the issue to be used 
with respect to an output facility are to be used for a private business 
use. Investment proceeds are disregarded for this purpose if they are 
not allocated disproportionately to the private business use portion of 
the issue.
    (ii) The payment of the principal of, or the interest on, more than 
$15 million of the sale proceeds of the portion of the issue used with 
respect to an output facility is (under the terms of the issue or any 
underlying arrangement) directly or indirectly--
    (A) Secured by any interest in an output facility used or to be used 
for a private business use (or payments in respect of such an output 
facility); or
    (B) To be derived from payments (whether or not to the issuer) in 
respect of an output facility used or to be used for a private business 
use.
    (2) Reduction in $15 million output limitation for outstanding 
issues--(i) General rule. In determining whether an issue 5 percent or 
more of the proceeds of which are to be used with respect to an output 
facility consists of private activity bonds under the $15 million output 
limitation, the $15 million limitation on private business use and 
private security or payments is applied by taking into account the 
aggregate nonqualified amounts of any outstanding bonds of other issues 
5 percent or more of the proceeds of which are or will be used with 
respect to that output facility or any other output facility that is 
part of the same project.
    (ii) Bonds taken into account. For purposes of this paragraph 
(a)(2), in applying the $15 million output limitation to an issue (the 
later issue), a tax-exempt bond of another issue (the earlier issue) is 
taken into account if--
    (A) That bond is outstanding on the issue date of the later issue;
    (B) That bond will not be redeemed within 90 days of the issue date 
of the later issue in connection with the refunding of that bond by the 
later issue; and
    (C) 5 percent or more of the sale proceeds of the earlier issue 
financed an output facility that is part of the same project as the 
output facility that is financed by 5 percent or more of the sale 
proceeds of the later issue.
    (3) Benefits and burdens test applicable--(i) In general. In 
applying the $15 million output limitation, the benefits and burdens 
test of Sec. 1.141-7 applies, except that ``$15 million'' is applied in 
place of ``10 percent'', or ``5 percent'' as appropriate.
    (ii) Earlier issues for the project. If bonds of an earlier issue 
are outstanding and must be taken into account under paragraph (a)(2) of 
this section, the nonqualified amount for that earlier issue is 
multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the adjusted issue 
price of the earlier issue as of the issue date of the later issue, and 
the denominator of which is the issue price of the earlier issue. Pre-
issuance accrued interest as defined in Sec. 1.148-1(b) is disregarded 
for this purpose.
    (b) Definition of project--(1) General rule. For purposes of 
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, project has the meaning provided in 
this paragraph. Facilities that are functionally related and subordinate 
to a project are treated as part of that same project. Facilities having 
different purposes or serving

[[Page 658]]

different customer bases are not ordinarily part of the same project. 
For example, the following are generally not part of the same project--
    (i) Generation, transmission and distribution facilities;
    (ii) Separate facilities designed to serve wholesale customers and 
retail customers; and
    (iii) A peaking unit and a baseload unit (regardless of the location 
of the units).
    (2) Separate ownership. Except as otherwise provided in this 
paragraph (b)(2), facilities that are not owned by the same person are 
not part of the same project. If different governmental persons act in 
concert to finance a project, however (for example as participants in a 
joint powers authority), their interests are aggregated with respect to 
that project to determine whether the $15 million output limitation is 
met. In the case of undivided ownership interests in a single output 
facility, property that is not owned by different persons is treated as 
separate projects only if the separate interests are financed--
    (i) With bonds of different issuers; and
    (ii) Without a principal purpose of avoiding the limitation in this 
section.
    (3) Generating property--(i) Property on same site. In the case of 
generation and related facilities, project means property located at the 
same site.
    (ii) Special rule for generating units. Separate generating units 
are not part of the same project if one unit is reasonably expected, on 
the issue date of each issue that finances the units, to be placed in 
service more than 3 years before the other. Common facilities or 
property that will be functionally related to more than one generating 
unit must be allocated on a reasonable basis. If a generating unit 
already is constructed or is under construction (the first unit) and 
bonds are to be issued to finance an additional generating unit (the 
second unit), all costs for any common facilities paid or incurred 
before the earlier of the issue date of bonds to finance the second unit 
or the commencement of construction of the second unit are allocated to 
the first unit. At the time that bonds are issued to finance the second 
unit (or, if earlier, upon commencement of construction of that unit), 
any remaining costs of the common facilities may be allocated between 
the first and second units so that in the aggregate the allocation is 
reasonable.
    (4) Transmission and distribution. In the case of transmission or 
distribution facilities, project means functionally related or 
contiguous property. Separate transmission or distribution facilities 
are not part of the same project if one facility is reasonably expected, 
on the issue date of each issue that finances the facilities, to be 
placed in service more than 2 years before the other.
    (5) Subsequent improvements--(i) In general. An improvement to 
generation, transmission or distribution facilities that is not part of 
the original design of those facilities (the original project) is not 
part of the same project as the original project if the construction, 
reconstruction, or acquisition of that improvement commences more than 3 
years after the original project was placed in service and the bonds 
issued to finance that improvement are issued more than 3 years after 
the original project was placed in service.
    (ii) Special rule for transmission and distribution facilities. An 
improvement to transmission or distribution facilities that is not part 
of the original design of that property is not part of the same project 
as the original project if the issuer did not reasonably expect the need 
to make that improvement when it commenced construction of the original 
project and the construction, reconstruction, or acquisition of that 
improvement is mandated by the federal government or a state regulatory 
authority to accommodate requests for wheeling.
    (6) Replacement property. For purposes of this section, property 
that replaces existing property of an output facility is treated as part 
of the same project as the replaced property unless--
    (i) The need to replace the property was not reasonably expected on 
the issue date or the need to replace the property occurred more than 3 
years before the issuer reasonably expected (determined on the issue 
date of the bonds financing the property) that it would need to replace 
the property; and

[[Page 659]]

    (ii) The bonds that finance (and refinance) the output facility have 
a weighted average maturity that is not greater than 120 percent of the 
reasonably expected economic life of the facility.
    (c) Example. The application of the provisions of this section is 
illustrated by the following example:

    Example. (i) Power Authority K, a political subdivision, intends to 
issue a single issue of tax-exempt bonds at par with a stated principal 
amount and sale proceeds of $500 million to finance the acquisition of 
an electric generating facility. No portion of the facility will be used 
for a private business use, except that L, an investor-owned utility, 
will purchase 10 percent of the output of the facility under a take 
contract and will pay 10 percent of the debt service on the bonds. The 
nonqualified amount with respect to the bonds is $50 million.
    (ii) The maximum amount of tax-exempt bonds that may be issued for 
the acquisition of an interest in the facility in paragraph (i) of this 
Example is $465 million (that is, $450 million for the 90 percent of the 
facility that is governmentally owned and used plus a nonqualified 
amount of $15 million).

[T.D. 9016, 67 FR 59763, Sept. 23, 2002]