[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 2]
[Revised as of April 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 26CFR1.167(l)-2]

[Page 1029-1033]
 
                       TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
 
    CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 
                               (CONTINUED)
 
PART 1_INCOME TAXES--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 1.167(l)-2  Public utility property; election as to post-1969 
property representing growth in capacity.

    (a) In general. Section 167(l)(2) prescribes the methods of 
depreciation which may be used by a taxpayer with respect to its post-
1969 public utility property. Under section 167(l)(2) (A) and (B) the 
taxpayer may use a subsection (l) method of depreciation (as defined in 
section 167(l)(3)(F)) or any other method of depreciation which is 
otherwise allowable under section 167 if, in conjunction with the use of 
such other method, such taxpayer uses the normalization method of 
accounting (as defined in section 167(l)(3)(G)). Paragraph (2)(C) of 
section 167(l) permits a taxpayer which used the flow-through method of 
accounting for its July 1969 accounting period (as these terms are 
defined in section 167(l)(3) (H) and (I), respectively) to use its 
applicable 1968 method of depreciation with respect to certain property. 
Section 167(l)(3)(D) describes the term ``applicable 1968 method''. 
Accordingly, a regulatory agency is not precluded by section 167(l) from 
requiring such a taxpayer subject to its jurisdiction to continue to use 
the flow-through method of accounting unless the taxpayer makes the 
election pursuant to section 167(l)(4)(A) and this section. Whether or 
not the election is made, if such a regulatory agency permits the 
taxpayer to change from the flow-through method of accounting, 
subsection (l)(2) (A) or (B) would apply and such taxpayer could, 
subject to the provisions of section 167(e) and the regulations 
thereunder (relating to change in method), use a subsection (l) method 
of depreciation or, if the taxpayer uses the normalization method of 
accounting, any other method of depreciation otherwise allowable under 
section 167.
    (1) Election. Under subparagraph (A) of section 167(l)(4), if the 
taxpayer so elects, the provisions of paragraph (2)(C) of section 167(l) 
shall not apply to its qualified public utility property (as such term 
is described in paragraph (b) of this section). In such case the 
taxpayer making the election shall use a method of depreciation 
prescribed by section 167(l)(2) (A) or (B) with respect to such 
property.
    (2) Property to which election shall apply. (i) Except as provided 
in subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph the election provided by 
section 167(l)(4)(A) shall apply to all of the qualified public utility 
property of the taxpayer.
    (ii) In the event that the taxpayer wishes the election provided by 
section 167(l)(4)(A) to apply to only a portion of its qualified public 
utility property, it must clearly identify the property to be subject to 
the election in the statement of election described in paragraph (e) of 
this section. Where all property which performs a certain function is 
included within the election, the election shall apply to all future 
acquisitions of qualified public utility property which perform the same 
function. Where only certain property within a functional group of 
property is included within the election, the election shall apply only 
to property which is of the same kind as the included property.
    (iii) The provisions of subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph may be 
illustrated by the following examples:

    Example (1). Corporation A, an electric utility company, wishes to 
have the election provided by section 167(l)(4)(A) apply only with 
respect to its production plant. A statement that the election shall 
apply only with respect to production plant will be sufficient to 
include within the election all of the taxpayer's qualified production 
plant of any kind. All public utility property of the taxpayer other 
than production plant will not be subject to the election.
    Example (2). Corporation B, an electric utility company, wishes to 
have the election provided by section 167(l)(4)(A) apply only with 
respect to nuclear production plant. A statement which clearly indicates 
that only nuclear production plant will be included in the election will 
be sufficient to exclude

[[Page 1030]]

from the election all public utility property other than nuclear 
production plant.

    (b) Qualified public utility property--(1) Definition. For purposes 
of this section the term ``qualified public utility property'' means 
post-1969 public utility property to which section 167(l)(2)(C) applies, 
or would apply if the election described in section 167(l)(4)(A) had not 
been made, to the extent that such property constitutes property which 
increases the productive or operational capacity of the taxpayer with 
respect to the goods or services described in section 167(l)(3)(A) and 
does not represent the replacement of existing capacity. In the event 
that particular assets which are post-1969 public utility property both 
replace existing public utility property and increase the productive or 
operational capacity of the taxpayer, only that portion of each such 
asset which is properly allocable, pursuant to the provisions of 
subparagraph (3)(v) of this paragraph or paragraph (c)(2) of this 
section (as the case may be), to increasing the productive or 
operational capacity of the taxpayer shall be qualified public utility 
property.
    (2) Limitation on use of formula method. A taxpayer which makes the 
election with respect to all of its post-1969 public utility property 
may determine the amount of its qualified public utility property by 
using the formula method described in paragraph (c) of this section or, 
where the taxpayer so chooses, it may use any other method based on 
engineering data which is satisfactory to the Commissioner. A taxpayer 
which chooses to include only a portion of its post-1969 public utility 
property in the election described in paragraph (a)(1) of this section 
shall, in a manner satisfactory to the Commissioner and consistent with 
the provisions of subparagraph (3) of this paragraph, use a method based 
on engineering data. If a taxpayer uses the formula method described in 
paragraph (c) of this section, it must continue to use such method with 
respect to additions made in subsequent taxable years. The taxpayer may 
change from an engineering method to the formula method described in 
paragraph (c) of this section by filing a statement described in 
paragraph (h) of this section if it could have used such formula method 
for the prior taxable year.
    (3) Measuring capacity under an engineering method in the case of a 
general election. (i) The provisions of this subparagraph apply in the 
case of an election made with respect to all of the post-1969 public 
utility property of the taxpayer.
    (ii) A taxpayer which uses a method based on engineering data to 
determine the portion of its additions for a taxable year which 
constitutes qualified public utility property shall make such 
determination with reference to its ``adjusted capacity'' as of the 
first day of the taxable year during which such additions are placed in 
service. For purposes of this subparagraph, the term ``adjusted 
capacity'' means the taxpayer's capacity as of January 1, 1970, adjusted 
upward in the manner described in subdivision (iii) of this subparagraph 
for each taxable year ending after December 31, 1969, and before the 
first day of the taxable year during which the additions described in 
the preceding sentence are placed in service.
    (iii) The adjustment described in this subdivision for each taxable 
year shall be equal to the number of units of capacity by which 
additions for the taxable year of public utility property with respect 
to which the election had been made exceed the number of units of 
capacity of retirements for such taxable year of public utility property 
with respect to which the flow-through method of accounting was being 
used at the time of their retirement. If for any taxable year the 
computation in the preceding sentence results in a negative amount, such 
negative amount shall be taken into account as a reduction in the amount 
of the adjustment (computed without regard to this sentence) in 
succeeding taxable years.
    (iv) The provisions of this subparagraph may be illustrated by the 
following table which assumes that the taxpayer's adjusted capacity as 
of January 1, 1970, was 5,000 units:

[[Page 1031]]



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                           1                                    2               3               4                5               6               7
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                                                             Units of
                                                                          Flow-through                       Adjusted         Actual         qualified
                          Year                              Additions      retirements    Net additions    capacity \1\      capacity      additions \1\
                                                                                                                                                \2\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1970...................................................            1000             700             300             5000            5300             300
1971...................................................             300             500            (200)            5300            5100  ..............
1972...................................................             500             200             300             5300            5400             100
1973...................................................             400             800            (400)            5400            5000  ..............
1974...................................................             600             400             200             5400            5200  ..............
1975...................................................             800             300             500             5400            5700             300
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Capacity as of Jan. 1, 1970, plus amounts in column 7 for years prior to the year for which determination is being made.
\2\ Column 6 minus column 5.

    (v) The qualified portion of the basis for depreciation (as defined 
in section 167(g)) of each asset or group of assets (if group or 
composite accounting is used by the taxpayer) subject to the election 
shall be determined using the following ratio:

Qualified portion of basis of asset / Total basis of asset = Units of 
qualified additions computed in column 7 on chart / Units of capacity of 
additions computed in column 2 on chart.

    (c) Formula method of determining amount of property subject to 
election--(1) In general. The following formula method may be used to 
determine the amount of qualified public utility property:

    Step 1. Find the total cost (within the meaning of section 1012) to 
the taxpayer of additions during the taxable year of all post-1969 
public utility property with respect to which section 167(l)(2)(C) would 
apply if the election had not been made.
    Step 2. Aggregate the cost (within the meaning of section 1012) to 
the taxpayer of all retirements during the taxable year of public 
utility property with respect to which the flow-through method of 
accounting was being used at the time of their retirement.
    Step 3. Subtract the figure reached in step 2 from the figure 
reached in step 1.


In the event that the figure reached in step 2 exceeds the figure 
reached in step 1 such excess shall be carried forward to the next 
taxable year and shall be aggregated with the cost (within the meaning 
of section 1012) to the taxpayer of all retirements referred to in step 
2 for such next taxable year.
    (2) Allocation of bases. The amount of qualified public utility 
property as determined in accordance with the formula method described 
in subparagraph (1) of this paragraph shall be allocated to the basis 
for depreciation (as defined in section 167(g)) of each asset or group 
of assets (if group or composite accounting is used by the taxpayer) 
subject to the election using the following ratio:

Amount of qualified additions computed in step 3 / Amount of total 
additions computed in step 1 = Qualified portion of basis of asset / 
Total basis of asset.

    (d) Examples. The provisions of this section may be illustrated by 
the following examples:

    Example (1). Corporation A, a telephone company subject to the 
jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission, elected, pursuant 
to the provisions of section 167(l)(4)(A) and this section, with respect 
to all of its qualified post-1969 public utility property to have the 
provisions of paragraph (2) (C) of section 167(l) not apply. In 1971 the 
Corporation added new underground cable with a cost (within the meaning 
of section 1012) to it of $4 million to its underground cable account. 
In the same year it retired public utility property with a cost (within 
the meaning of section 1012) to Corporation A of $1.5 million. The flow-
through method of accounting was being used with respect to all of the 
retired property at the time of retirement. Using the formula method 
described in paragraph (c) of this section, the amount of qualified 
underground cable would be determined as follows:


                                                                 Million

Step 1. Aggregate cost of flow-through additions..............      $4.0
Step 2. Cost of all flow-through retirements..................       1.5
                                                               ---------
Step 3. Figure reached in step 1 less figure reached in step 2       2.5



The amount of qualified public utility property to which section 
167(l)(2)(C) will not apply is $2.5 million. Pursuant to the provisions 
of paragraph (c)(2) of this section, the amount of qualified public 
utility property would be allocated to the basis for depreciation (as 
defined in section 167(g)) of an asset with a total basis for 
depreciation of $2 million as follows:


[[Page 1032]]


$2.5 million (figure in step 3)/$4 million (figure in step 1) = 
Qualified portion of basis of asset/$2 million Qualified portion of 
basis of asset =$1.25 million.
    Example (2). In 1972 Corporation A (the corporation described in 
example (1)) added underground cable with a cost (within the meaning of 
section 1012) to it of $1 million. In the same year the cost (within the 
meaning of section 1012) to the corporation of retirements of public 
utility property with respect to which the flow-through method of 
accounting was being used was $3 million. There were no other additions 
or retirements. The amount of qualified public utility property would be 
determined as follows:


                                                                Million

Step 1. Aggregate cost of flow-through additions.............      $1.0
Step 2. Cost of all flow-through retirements.................       3.0
                                                              ----------
Step 3. Figure reached in step 1 less figure reached in step       (2.0)
 2...........................................................



Since retirements of flow-through public utility property for the year 
1972 exceeded additions made during such year, the excess retirements, 
$2.0 million, must be carried forward to be aggregated with retirements 
for 1973.
    Example (3). Corporation B, a gas pipeline company subject to the 
jurisdiction of the Federal Power Commission, made the election provided 
by section 167(l)(4)(A) and this section with respect to all of its 
post-1969 public utility property. Corporation B chose to use an 
engineering data method of determining which property was subject to the 
election provided by this section. In 1970, the corporation replaced a 
portion of its pipeline with respect to which the flow-through method of 
accounting was being used at the time of its retirement which had a peak 
capacity on January 1, 1970, of 100,000 thousand cubic feet (M c.f.) per 
day at a pressure of 14.73 pounds per square inch absolute (p.s.i.a.) 
with pipe with a capacity of 125,000 M c.f. per day at 14.73 p.s.i.a. 
Assuming that there were no other additions or retirements, using an 
engineering data method one-fifth of the new pipeline would be property 
subject to the election of this section effective for its taxable year 
beginning on January 1, 1971.
    Example (4). In 1970 Corporation C (with the same characteristics as 
the corporation described in example (3)) extended its pipeline 5 miles 
further than it extended on January 1, 1970. Assuming that there were no 
other additions or retirements, the entire extension would be property 
subject to the election provided by this section effective for its 
taxable year beginning on January 1, 1971.
    Example (5). As a result of a change of service areas between two 
corporations, in 1970 Corporation D (with the same characteristics as 
the corporation described in example (3)) retired a pipeline running 
north and south and replaced it with a pipeline of equal length and 
capacity running east and west. No part of the pipeline running east and 
west is property subject to the election.

    (e) Manner of making election. The election described in paragraph 
(a) of this section shall be made by filing, in duplicate, with the 
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Washington, D.C. 20224, Attention, 
T:I:E, a statement of such election.
    (f) Content of statement. The statement described in paragraph (e) 
of this section shall indicate that an election is being made under 
section 167(l) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954, and it shall 
contain the following information:
    (1) The name, address, and taxpayer identification number of the 
taxpayer,
    (2) Whether the taxpayer will use the formula method of determining 
the amount of its qualified public utility property described in 
paragraph (c) of this section, or an engineering method, and
    (3) Where the taxpayer wishes to include only a portion of its 
public utility property in the election pursuant to the provisions of 
paragraph (a)(2) of this section, a description sufficient to clearly 
identify the property to be included.
    (g) Time for making election. The election permitted by this section 
shall be made by filing the statement described in paragraph (e) of this 
section not later than Monday, June 29, 1970.
    (h) Change of method of determining amount of qualified property. 
Where a taxpayer which has elected pursuant to the provisions of section 
167(l)(4)(A) wishes to change, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 
(b)(2) of this section, from an engineering data method of determining 
which of its property is qualified public utility property to the 
formula method described in paragraph (c) of this section, it may do so 
by filing a statement to that effect at the time that it files its 
income tax return, with the district director or director of the 
regional service center, with whom the taxpayer's income tax return is 
required to be filed.
    (i) Revocability of election. An election made under section 167(l) 
shall be irrevocable.

[[Page 1033]]

    (j) Effective date. The election prescribed by section 167(l)(4)(A) 
and this section shall be effective for taxable years beginning after 
December 31, 1970.

[T.D. 7045, 35 FR 8933, June 10, 1970. Redesignated by T.D. 7315, 39 FR 
20195, June 7, 1974]