[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 1]
[Revised as of April 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 26CFR1.279-3]

[Page 645-649]
 
                       TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
 
    CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 
                               (CONTINUED)
 
PART 1_INCOME TAXES--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 1.279-3  Corporate acquisition indebtedness.

    (a) Corporate acquisition indebtedness. For purposes of section 279, 
the term corporate acquisition indebtedness means any obligation 
evidenced by a bond, debenture, note, or certificate or other evidence 
of indebtedness issued after October 9, 1969, by a corporation (referred 
to in section 279 and the regulations thereunder as ``issuing 
corporation'') if the obligation is issued to provide consideration 
directly or indirectly for the acquisition of stock in, or certain 
assets of, another corporation (as described in paragraph (b) of this 
Sec. 1.279-3), is ``subordinated'' (as described in paragraph (c) of 
this Sec. 1.279-3), is ``convertible'' (as described in paragraph (d) 
of this Sec. 1.279-3), and satisfies either the ratio of debt to equity 
test (as described in paragraph (f) of Sec. 1.279-5) or the projected 
earnings test (as described in paragraph (d) of Sec. 1.279-5).
    (b) Acquisition of stock or assets. (1) Section 279(b)(1) describes 
one of the tests to be satisfied if an obligation is to be classified as 
corporate acquisition indebtedness. Under section 279(b)(1), the 
obligation must be issued to provide consideration directly or 
indirectly for the acquisition of:
    (i) Stock (whether voting or nonvoting) in another corporation 
(referred to in section 279 and the regulations thereunder as ``acquired 
corporation''), or
    (ii) Assets of another corporation (referred to in section 279 and 
the regulations thereunder as ``acquired corporation'') pursuant to a 
plan under which at least two-thirds (in value) of all the assets 
(excluding money) used in trades

[[Page 646]]

or businesses carried on by such corporation are acquired.

The fact that the corporation that issues the obligation is not the same 
corporation that acquires the acquired corporation does not prevent the 
application of section 279. For example, if X Corporation acquires all 
the stock of Y Corporation through the utilization of an obligation of Z 
Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of X Corporation, this section 
will apply.
    (2) Direct or indirect consideration. Obligations are issued to 
provide direct consideration for an acquisition within the meaning of 
section 279(b)(1) where the obligations are issued to the shareholders 
of an acquired corporation in exchange for stock in such acquired 
corporation or where the obligations are issued to the acquired 
corporation in exchange for its assets. The application of the 
provisions of this subsection relating to indirect consideration for an 
acquisition of stock or assets depends upon the facts and circumstances 
surrounding the acquisition and the issuance of the obligations. 
Obligations are issued to provide indirect consideration for an 
acquisition of stock or assets within the meaning of section 279(b)(1) 
where (i) at the time of the issuance of the obligations the issuing 
corporation anticipated the acquisition of such stock or assets and the 
obligations would not have been issued if the issuing corporation had 
not so anticipated such acquisition, or where (ii) at the time of the 
acquisition the issuing corporation foresaw or reasonably should have 
foreseen that it would be required to issue obligations, which it would 
not have otherwise been required to issue if the acquisition had not 
occurred, in order to meet its future economic needs.
    (3) Stock acquisition. (i) For purposes of section 279, an 
acquisition in which the issuing corporation issues an obligation to 
provide consideration directly or indirectly for the acquisition of 
stock in the acquired corporation shall be treated as a stock 
acquisition within the meaning of section 279(b)(1)(A). Where the stock 
of one corporation is acquired from another corporation and such stock 
constitutes at least two-thirds (in value) of all the assets (excluding 
money) of the latter corporation, such acquisition shall be deemed an 
asset acquisition as described in section 279(b)(1)(B) and subparagraph 
(4) of this section. If the issuing corporation acquires less than two-
thirds (in value) of all the assets (excluding money) used in trades or 
businesses carried on by the acquired corporation within the meaning of 
section 279(b)(1)(B) and subparagraph (4) of this paragraph and such 
assets include stock of another corporation, the acquisition of such 
stock is a stock acquisition within the meaning of section 279(b)(1)(A) 
and of this subparagraph. In such a case the amount of the obligation 
which is characterized as corporate acquisition indebtedness shall bear 
the same relationship to the total amount of the obligation issued as 
the fair market value of the stock acquired bears to the total of the 
fair market value of the assets acquired and stock acquired, as of the 
date of acquisition. For rules with respect to acquisitions of stock, 
where the total amount of stock of the acquired corporation held by the 
issuing corporation never exceeded 5 percent of the total combined 
voting power of all classes of stock of the acquired corporation 
entitled to vote, see Sec. 1.279-4(b)(1).
    (ii) If the issuing corporation acquired stock of an acquired 
corporation in an acquisition described in section 279(b)(1)(A), and 
liquidated the acquired corporation under section 334(b)(2) and the 
regulations thereunder before the last day of the taxable year in which 
such stock acquisition is made, such obligation issued to provide 
consideration directly or indirectly to acquire such stock of the 
acquired corporation shall be considered as issued in an acquisition 
described in section 279(b)(1)(B).
    (4) Asset acquisition. (i) For purposes of section 279, an 
acquisition in which the issuing corporation issues an obligation to 
provide consideration directly or indirectly for the acquisition of 
assets of an acquired corporation pursuant to a plan under which at 
least two-thirds of the gross value of all the assets (excluding money) 
used in trades and businesses carried on by such acquired corporation 
are acquired shall be treated as an asset acquisition within the meaning 
of section 279(b)(1)(B).

[[Page 647]]

For purposes of section 279(b)(1)(B), the gross value of any acquired 
asset shall be its fair market value as of the day of its acquisition. 
In determining the fair market value of an asset, no reduction shall be 
made for any liabilities, mortgages, liens, or other encumbrances to 
which the asset or any part thereof may be subjected. For purposes of 
this subparagraph, an asset which has been actually used in the trades 
and businesses of a corporation but which is temporarily not being used 
in such trades and businesses shall be treated as if it is being used in 
such manner. For purposes of this paragraph, the day of acquisition will 
be determined by reference to the facts and circumstances surrounding 
the transaction.
    (ii) For purposes of the two-thirds test described in section 
279(b)(1)(B), the stock of any corporation which is controlled by the 
acquired corporation shall be considered as an asset used in the trades 
and businesses of such acquired corporation.
    (5) Certain nontaxable transactions. (i) Under section 279(e), an 
acquisition of stock of a corporation of which the issuing corporation 
is in control in a transaction in which gain or loss is not recognized 
shall be deemed an acquisition described in section 279(b)(1)(A) only if 
immediately before such transaction the acquired corporation was in 
existence, and the issuing corporation was not in control of such 
corporation. If the issuing corporation is a member of an affiliated 
group, then in accordance with section 279(g), the affiliated group 
shall be treated as the issuing corporation. Thus, any stock of the 
acquired corporation, owned by members of the affiliated group, shall be 
aggregated in determining whether the issuing corporation was in control 
of the acquired corporation.
    (ii) The $5 million limitation provided by section 279(a)(1) is not 
reduced by the interest on an obligation issued in a transaction which, 
under section 279 (e), is deemed not to be an acquisition described in 
section 279(b)(1).
    (iii) The provisions of this subparagraph may be illustrated by the 
following examples:

    Example 1. On January 1, 1973, W Corporation, a calendar year 
taxpayer, issues to the public 10,000 10 year convertible bonds each 
with a principal of $1,000 for $9 million. On June 6, 1973, W 
Corporation transfers the $9 million proceeds of such bond issue to X 
Corporation in exchange for X Corporation's common stock in a 
transaction that satisfies the provisions of section 351(a). On December 
31, 1973, W Corporation's ratio of debt to equity is 1 1/2 to 1 and its 
project earnings exceed three times the annual interest to be paid or 
incurred. Immediately prior to the transaction between the two 
corporations W Corporation owned no stock in X Corporation which had 
been in existence for several years. However, immediately after this 
transaction W Corporation is in control of X Corporation. Since X 
Corporation, the acquired corporation, was in existence and W 
Corporation, the issuing corporation, was not in control of X 
Corporation immediately before the section 351 transaction (a 
transaction in which gain or loss is not recognized) and since W 
Corporation is now in control of X Corporation, the acquisition of X 
Corporation's common stock by W Corporation is not protected from 
treatment as an acquisition described in section 279(b)(1)(A). However, 
the obligation will not be deemed to be corporate acquisition 
indebtedness since the test of section 279(b)(4) is not met. The 
interest on the obligation will reduce the $5 million limitation of 
section 279(a).
    Example 2. Assume the facts are the same as described in Example 1, 
except that X Corporation was not in existence prior to June 6, 1973, 
but rather is newly created by W Corporation on such date. Since X 
Corporation, the acquired corporation, was not in existence before June 
6, 1973, the date on which W Corporation, the issuing corporation, 
acquired control of X Corporation in a transaction on which gain or loss 
is not recognized, the acquisition is not deemed to be an acquisition 
described in section 279(b)(1)(A). Thus, under the provisions of 
subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph, the $5 million limitation 
provided by section 279(a)(1) will not be reduced by the yearly interest 
incurred on the convertible bonds issued by W Corporation.
    Example 3. Assume that the facts are the same as described in 
Example 1, except that W Corporation was in control of X Corporation 
immediately before the transaction. Since W Corporation was in control 
of X Corporation immediately before the section 351(a) transaction and 
is in control of X Corporation after such transaction, the result will 
be the same as in Example 2.

    (c) Subordinated obligation--(1) In general. An obligation which is 
issued to provide consideration for an acquisition described in section 
279(b)(1) is

[[Page 648]]

subordinated within the meaning of section 279(b)(2) if it is either:
    (i) Subordinated to the claims of trade creditors of the issuing 
corporation generally, or
    (ii) Expressly subordinated in right of payment to the payment of 
any substantial amount of unsecured indebtedness, whether outstanding or 
subsequently issued, of the issuing corporation, irrespective of whether 
such subordination relates to payment of interest, or principal, or 
both. In applying section 279 (b)(2) and this paragraph in any case 
where the issuing corporation is a member of an affiliated group of 
corporations, the affiliated group shall be treated as the issuing 
corporation.
    (2) Expressly subordinated obligation. In applying subparagraph 
(1)(ii) of this paragraph, an obligation is considered expressly 
subordinated whether the terms of the subordination are provided in the 
evidence of indebtedness itself, or in another agreement between the 
parties to such obligation. An obligation shall be considered to be 
expressly subordinated within the meaning of subparagraph (1)(ii) of 
this paragraph if such obligation by its terms can become subordinated 
in right of payment to the payment of any substantial amount of 
unsecured indebtedness which is outstanding or which may be issued 
subsequently. However, an obligation shall not be considered expressly 
subordinated if such subordination occurs solely by operation of law, 
such as in the case of bankruptcy laws. For purposes of this paragraph, 
the term substantial amount of unsecured indebtedness means an amount of 
unsecured indebtedness equal to 5 percent or more of the face amount of 
the obligations issued within the meaning of section 279(b)(1).
    (d) Convertible obligation. An obligation which is issued to provide 
consideration directly or indirectly for an acquisition described in 
section 279 (b)(1) is convertible within the meaning of section 
279(b)(3) if it is either-- (1) Convertible directly or indirectly into 
stock of the issuing corporation, or (2) Part of an investment unit or 
other arrangement which includes, in addition to such bond or other 
evidence of indebtedness, an option to acquire directly or indirectly 
stock in the issuing corporation. Stock warrants or convertible 
preferred stock included as part of an investment unit constitute 
options within the meaning of the preceding sentence. Indebtedness is 
indirectly convertible if the conversion feature gives the holder the 
right to convert into another bond of the issuing corporation which is 
then convertible into the stock of the issuing corporation. In any case 
where the corporation which in fact issues an obligation to provide 
consideration for an acquisition described in section 279(b)(1) is a 
member of an affiliated group, the provisions of section 279(b)(3) and 
this paragraph are deemed satisfied if the stock into which either the 
obligation or option which is part of an investment unit or other 
arrangement is convertible, directly or indirectly, is stock of any 
member of the affiliated group.
    (e) Ratio of debt to equity and projected earnings test. For rules 
with respect to the application of section 279(b)(4) (relating to the 
ratio of debt to equity and the ratio of projected earnings to annual 
interest to be paid or incurred), see paragraphs (d), (e), and (f) of 
Sec. 1.279-5.
    (f) Certain obligations issued after October 9, 1969--(1) In 
general. Under section 279(i), an obligation shall not be corporate 
acquisition indebtedness if such obligation is issued after October 9, 
1969, to provide consideration for the acquisition of:
    (i) Stock or assets pursuant to a binding written contract which was 
in effect on October 9, 1969, and at all times thereafter before such 
acquisition, or
    (ii) Stock in any corporation where the issuing corporation, on 
October 9, 1969, and at all times thereafter before such acquisition, 
owned at least 50 percent of the total combined voting power of all 
classes of stock entitled to vote of the acquired corporation.

Subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph shall cease to apply when (at any 
time on or after October 9, 1969) the issuing corporation has acquired 
control of the acquired corporation. The interest attributable to any 
obligation which satisfies the conditions stated in the first sentence 
of this subparagraph shall reduce the $5 million limitation of section 
279(a)(1).

[[Page 649]]

    (2) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph may be illustrated by 
the following examples:

    Example 1. On September 5, 1969, M Corporation, a calendar year 
taxpayer, entered into a binding written contract with N Corporation to 
purchase 20 percent of the voting stock of N Corporation. The contract 
was in effect on October 9, 1969, and at all times thereafter before the 
acquisition of the stock on January 1, 1970. Pursuant to such contract M 
Corporation issued on January 1, 1970, to N Corporation an obligation 
which satisfies the tests of section 279(b) requiring it to pay $1 
million of interest each year. However, under the provisions of 
subparagraph (1)(i) of this paragraph, such obligation is not corporate 
acquisition indebtedness since it was issued to provide consideration 
for the acquisition of stock pursuant to a binding written contract 
which was in effect on October 9, 1969, and at all times thereafter 
before such acquisition. The $1 million of yearly interest on the 
obligation reduces the $5 million limitation provided for in section 
279(a)(1) to $4 million since such interest is attributable to an 
obligation which was issued to provide consideration for the acquisition 
of stock in an acquired corporation.
    Example 2. On October 9, 1969, O Corporation, a calendar year 
taxpayer, owned 50 percent of the total combined voting power of all 
classes of stock entitled to vote of P Corporation. P Corporation has no 
other class of stock. On January 1, 1970, while still owning such voting 
stock O Corporation issued to the shareholders of P Corporation to 
provide consideration for an additional 40 percent of P Corporation's 
voting stock an obligation which satisfied the tests of section 279(b) 
requiring it to pay $4 million of interest each year. Hence, O 
Corporation acquired control of P Corporation, and the provisions of 
subparagraph (1)(ii) of this paragraph ceased to apply to O Corporation. 
Thus, 75 percent of the obligation issued by O Corporation to provide 
consideration for the stock of P Corporation is not corporate 
acquisition indebtedness (that is, of the 40 percent of the voting stock 
of P Corporation which was acquired, only 30 percent was needed to give 
O Corporation control). Since 25 percent of the obligation is corporate 
acquisition indebtedness, $1 million of interest attributable to such 
obligation is subject to disallowance under section 279(a) for the 
taxable year 1970. The remaining $3 million of interest attributable to 
the obligation will reduce the $5 million limitation provided by in 
section 279(a)(1).

    (g) Exemptions for certain acquisitions of foreign corporations--(1) 
In general. Under section 279(f), the term corporate acquisition 
indebtedness does not include any indebtedness issued to any person to 
provide consideration directly or indirectly for the acquisition of 
stock in, or assets of, any foreign corporation substantially all the 
income of which, for the 3-year period ending with the date of such 
acquisition or for such part of such period as the foreign corporation 
was in existence, is from sources without the United States. The 
interest attributable to any obligation excluded from treatment as 
corporate acquisition indebtedness by reason of this paragraph shall 
reduce the $5 million limitation of 279(a)(1).
    (2) Foreign corporation. For purposes of this paragraph, the term 
foreign corporation shall have the same meaning as in section 
7701(a)(5).
    (3) Income from sources without the United States. For purposes of 
this paragraph, the term income from sources without the United States 
shall be determined in accordance with sections 862 and 863. If more 
than 80 percent of a foreign corporation's gross income is derived from 
sources without the United States, such corporation shall be considered 
to be deriving substantially all of its income from sources without the 
United States.

[T.D. 7262, 38 FR 5845, Mar. 5, 1973]