[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 7]
[Revised as of April 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 26CFR1.533-1]

[Page 242-244]
 
                       TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
 
    CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 
                               (CONTINUED)
 
PART 1_INCOME TAXES--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 1.533-1  Evidence of purpose to avoid income tax.

    (a) In general. (1) The Commissioner's determination that a 
corporation was formed or availed of for the purpose of avoiding income 
tax with respect to shareholders is subject to disproof by competent 
evidence. Section 533(a) provides that the fact that earnings and 
profits of a corporation are permitted to accumulate beyond the 
reasonable needs of the business shall be determinative of the purpose 
to avoid the income tax with respect to shareholders unless the 
corporation, by the preponderance of the evidence, shall prove to the 
contrary. The burden of proving that earnings and profits have been 
permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business may 
be shifted to the Commissioner under section 534. See Sec. Sec. 1.534-1 
through 1.534-4. Section 533(b) provides that the fact that the taxpayer 
is a mere holding or investment company shall be prima facie evidence of 
the purpose to avoid income tax with respect to shareholders.
    (2) The existence or nonexistence of the purpose to avoid income tax 
with respect to shareholders may be indicated by circumstances other 
than the conditions specified in section 533. Whether or not such 
purpose was present depends upon the particular circumstances of each 
case. All circumstances which might be construed as evidence of the 
purpose to avoid income tax with respect to shareholders cannot be 
outlined, but among other things, the following will be considered:
    (i) Dealings between the corporation and its shareholders, such as 
withdrawals by the shareholders as personal loans or the expenditure of 
funds by the corporation for the personal benefit of the shareholders,
    (ii) The investment by the corporation of undistributed earnings in 
assets having no reasonable connection with the business of the 
corporation (see Sec. 1.537-3), and

[[Page 243]]

    (iii) The extent to which the corporation has distributed its 
earnings and profits.

The fact that a corporation is a mere holding or investment company or 
has an accumulation of earnings and profits in excess of the reasonable 
needs of the business is not absolutely conclusive against it if the 
taxpayer satisfies the Commissioner that the corporation was neither 
formed nor availed of for the purpose of avoiding income tax with 
respect to shareholders.
    (b) General burden of proof and statutory presumptions. The 
Commissioner may determine that the taxpayer was formed or availed of to 
avoid income tax with respect to shareholders through the medium of 
permitting earnings and profits to accumulate. In the case of litigation 
involving any such determination (except where the burden of proof is on 
the Commissioner under section 534), the burden of proving such 
determination wrong by a preponderance of the evidence, together with 
the corresponding burden of first going forward with the evidence, is on 
the taxpayer under principles applicable to income tax cases generally. 
For the burden of proof in a proceeding before the Tax Court with 
respect to the allegation that earnings and profits have been permitted 
to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business, see section 
534 and Sec. Sec. 1.534-2 through 1.534-4. For a definition of a 
holding or investment company, see paragraph (c) of this section. For 
determination of the reasonable needs of the business, see section 537 
and Sec. Sec. 1.537-1 through 1.537-3. If the taxpayer is a mere 
holding or investment company, and the Commissioner therefore determines 
that the corporation was formed or availed of for the purpose of 
avoiding income tax with respect to shareholders, then section 533(b) 
gives further weight to the presumption ofcorrectness already arising 
from the Commissioner's determination by expressly providing an 
additional presumption of the existence of a purpose to avoid income tax 
with respect to shareholders. Further, if it is established (after 
complying with section 534 where applicable) that earnings and profits 
were permitted to accumulate beyond the reasonable needs of the business 
and the Commissioner has therefore determined that the corporation was 
formed or availed of for the purpose of avoiding income tax with respect 
to shareholders, then section 533(a) adds still more weight to the 
Commissioner's determination. Under such circumstances, the existence of 
such an accumulation is made determinative of the purpose to avoid 
income tax with respect to shareholders unless the taxpayer proves to 
the contrary by the preponderance of the evidence.
    (c) Holding or investment company. A corporation having practically 
no activities except holding property and collecting the income 
therefrom or investing therein shall be considered a holding company 
within the meaning of section 533(b). If the activities further include, 
or consist substantially of, buying and selling stocks, securities, real 
estate, or other investment property (whether upon an outright or 
marginal basis) so that the income is derived not only from the 
investment yield but also from profits upon market fluctuations, the 
corporation shall be considered an investment company within the meaning 
of section 533(b).
    (d) Small business investment companies. A corporation which is 
licensed to operate as a small business investment company under the 
Small Business Investment Act of 1958 (15 U.S.C. ch. 14B) and the 
regulations thereunder (13 CFR part 107) will generally be considered to 
be a mere holding or investment company within the meaning of section 
533(b). However, the presumption of the existence of the purpose to 
avoid income tax with respect to shareholders which results from the 
fact that such a company is a mere holding or investment company will be 
considered overcome so long as such company:
    (1) Complies with all the provisions of the Small Business 
Investment Act of 1958 and the regulations thereunder; and
    (2) Actively engages in the business of providing funds to small 
business concerns through investment in the equity capital of, or 
through the disbursement of long-term loans to, such concerns in such 
manner and under such terms as the company may fix in

[[Page 244]]

accordance with regulations promulgated by the Small Business 
Administration (see secs. 304 and 305 of the Small Business Investment 
Act of 1958, as amended (15 U.S.C. 684, 685)).

On the other hand, if such a company violates or fails to comply with 
any of the provisions of the Small Business Investment Act of 1958, as 
amended, or the regulations thereunder, or ceases to be actively engaged 
in the business of providing funds to small business concerns in the 
manner provided in subparagraph (2) of this paragraph, it will not be 
considered to have overcome the presumption by reason of any rules 
provided in this paragraph.

[T.D. 6500, 25 FR 11737, Nov. 26, 1960, as amended by T.D. 6652, 28 FR 
4786, May 14, 1963]