[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 7]
[Revised as of April 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 26CFR1.615-4]

[Page 511-514]
 
                       TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
 
    CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 
                               (CONTINUED)
 
PART 1_INCOME TAXES--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 1.615-4  Limitation of amount deductible.

    (a) Taxable years beginning before July 7, 1960. For any taxable 
year beginning before July 7, 1960 (including taxable years of less than 
12 months), a taxpayer may deduct or defer exploration expenditures paid 
or incurred in the taxable year in an amount not in excess of $100,000. 
However, for such taxable years, the taxpayer may not avail himself of 
the provisions of section 615 for more than four taxable years 
(including taxable years of less than 12 months and taxable years 
subject to the Internal Revenue Code of 1939). Such four taxable years 
need not be consecutive. In determining the number of years in which a 
taxpayer has availed himself of section 615, a year for which he makes 
an election to defer exploration expenditures shall count as one year. 
Any subsequent taxable year in which such deferred expenditures 
arededucted shall not be taken into account as one of the four years. 
For purposes of the 4-year limitation, a year in which both a deduction 
and an election to defer are availed of by the taxpayer shall be taken 
into account as only one year.

    (b) Taxable years beginning after July 6, 1960. For any taxable year 
beginning after July 6, 1960 (including taxable years of less than 12 
months), a taxpayer who is otherwise eligible may deduct or defer 
exploration expenditures paid or incurred before January 1, 1970, in the 
lesser of the following amounts:

    (1) The amount paid or incurred in the taxable year,

    (2) $100,000, or

    (3) $400,000 minus all amounts deducted or deferred for taxable 
years ending after December 31, 1950.

For purposes of this paragraph, the number of taxable years for which 
the taxpayer availed himself of the provisions of section 615 or the 
corresponding provisions of prior law is immaterial.

    (c) Special rules for previously deferred expenditures. In 
determining whether an election to defer was availed of in applying the 
limitations of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, there shall be 
taken into account any year with respect to which amounts were deferred 
but not fully deducted because of a sale or other disposition of the 
mineral property, even though the balance of the deferred amounts was 
treated as part of the basis of the mineral property in determining gain 
or loss from the sale.

    (d) Example of application of provisions. The application of the 
provisions of subparagraphs (a) and (b) of this section may be 
illustrated by the following example:

    Example. A taxpayer on the calendar year basis, who has never 
claimed the benefits of section 615, or section 23(ff) of the 1939 Code, 
expended $200,000 for exploration expenditures during the year 1956. For 
each of the years 1957, 1958, 1959, and 1960 the taxpayer had 
exploration costs of $80,000. The taxpayer deducted or deferred the 
maximum amounts allowed for each of the years 1956,

[[Page 512]]

1957, 1958, and 1959. None of the $80,000 expenditures for 1960 could be 
deducted or deferred by the taxpayer because he had already deducted or 
deferred exploration expenditures for 4 prior years. In 1961 the 
taxpayer expended $200,000 for exploration expenditures. The maximum 
amount the taxpayer may deduct or defer for the taxable year 1961 is 
$60,000 computed as follows:
    (1) Add all yearly amounts deducted or deferred for exploration 
expenditures by the taxpayer for prior years.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Deducted
                      Year                       Expenditures      or
                                                                deferred
------------------------------------------------------------------------
1956...........................................     $200,000    $100,000
1957...........................................       80,000      80,000
1958...........................................       80,000      80,000
1959...........................................       80,000      80,000
1960...........................................       80,000           0
                                                ---------------
    Total......................................  ............    340,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    (2) Subtract the sum of the amounts obtained in (1), $340,000, from 
$400,000, the maximum amount allowable to the taxpayer for deductions or 
deferrals of exploration expenditures.

Maximum amount allowable to taxpayer........................    $400,000
Sum of amounts obtained in (1)..............................     340,000
                                                             -----------
                                                                  60,000


    (e) Transferee of mineral property. (1) Where an individual or 
corporation transfers any property to the taxpayer and the transfer is 
one to which any of the subdivisions of this subparagraph apply, the 
taxpayer shall take into account for purposes of the 4-year limitation 
described in paragraph (a) of this section, all years that the 
transferor deducted or deferred exploration expenditures, and for 
purposes of the $400,000 limitation described in paragraph (b) of this 
section, all amounts that the transferor deducted or deferred.
    (i) The taxpayer acquired any mineral property in a transaction 
described in section 23(ff)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 
excluding the reference therein to section 113(a)(13).
    (ii) The taxpayer would be entitled under section 381(c)(10) to 
deduct exploration expenditures if the transferor (or distributor) 
corporation had elected to defer such expenditures. For example, if the 
taxpayer acquired any mineral property in a transaction described in 
section 381(a) (relating to the acquisition of assets through certain 
corporate liquidations and reorganizations), there shall be taken into 
account in applying the limitations of paragraph (a) of this section the 
years in which the transferor exercised the election to defer or deduct 
exploration expenditures, and there shall be taken into account in 
applying the limitations of paragraph (b) of this section any amount so 
deducted or deferred. See also section 381(c)(10) and the regulations 
thereunder.
    (iii) The taxpayer acquired any mineral property under circumstances 
which make applicable the following sections of the Internal Revenue 
Code:
    (a) Section 334(b)(1), relating to the liquidation of a subsidiary 
where the basis of the property in the hands of the distributee is the 
same as it would be in the hands of the transferor.
    (b) Section 362 (a) and (b), relating to property acquired by a 
corporation as paid-in surplus or as a contribution to capital, or in 
connection with a transaction to which section 351 applies.
    (c) Section 372(a), relating to reorganization in certain 
receiverships and bankruptcy proceedings.
    (d) Section 373(b)(1), relating to property of a railroad 
corporation acquired in certain bankruptcy or recivership proceedings.
    (e) Section 1051, relating to property acquired by a corporation 
that is a member of an affiliated group.
    (f) Section 1082, relating to property acquired pursuant to a 
Securities Exchange Commission order.
    (2) For purposes of subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, it is 
immaterial whether a deduction has been allowed or an election has been 
made by the transferor with respect to the specific mineral property 
transferred.
    (3) Where a mineral property is acquired under any circumstance 
except those described in subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, the 
taxpayer is not required to take into account the election exercised by 
or deduction allowed to his transferor.
    (4) For purposes of applying the limitations imposed by section 
615(c): (i) the partner, and not the partnership, shall be considered as 
the taxpayer (see paragraph (a)(8)(iii) of Sec. 1.702-1), and (ii) an 
electing small business corporation, as defined in section 1371(b), and 
not its shareholders, shall be considered as the taxpayer.

[[Page 513]]

    (5) For purposes of subparagraph (1)(iii)(b) of this paragraph: (i) 
if mineral property is acquired from a partnership, the transfer shall 
be considered as having been made by the individual partners, so that 
the number of years for which section 615 has been availed of by each 
partner and the amounts which each partner has deducted or deferred 
under section 615 shall be taken into account, or (ii) if on interest in 
a partnership having mineral property is transferred, the transfer shall 
be considered as a transfer of mineral property by the partner or 
partners relinquishing an interest, so that the number of years for 
which section 615 has been availed of by each such partner and the 
amounts which each such partner has deducted or deferred under section 
615 shall be taken into account.
    (f) Examples. The application of the provisions of this section may 
be illustrated by the following examples:

    Example 1. A calendar year taxpayer who has never claimed the 
benefits of section 615 received in 1956 a mineral deposit from X 
Corporation upon a distribution in complete liquidation of the latter 
under conditions which would make the provisions of section 334(b)(1) 
applicable in determining the basis of the property in the hands of the 
taxpayer. During the year 1955 X Corporation expended $60,000 for 
exploration expenditures which it elected to treat as deferred expenses. 
Assume further that the taxpayer made similar expenditures of $150,000, 
$125,000, $100,000, $60,000, and $180,000 for the years 1956, 1957, 
1958, 1959, and 1961, respectively, which the taxpayer elected to deduct 
for each of those years to the extent allowable. No such expenditures 
were made for 1960. On the basis of these facts, the taxpayer may deduct 
or defer $100,000 for each of the years 1956, 1957, and 1958. No 
deduction or deferral is allowable for 1959 since the 4-year limitation 
of paragraph (a) of this section applies. The taxpayer may deduct or 
defer a maximum of $40,000 for 1961 since the $400,000 limitation of 
paragraph (b) of this section applies, but the 4-year limitation of 
paragraph (a) does not apply.
    Example 2. Assume the same facts stated in example 1 except that, 
prior to acquisition by the taxpayer of the deposit from X Corporation 
in 1956, X Corporation had acquired the deposit in 1954 in a similar 
distribution from Y Corporation which, in the years 1952 and 1953, 
deducted exploration costs paid in respect of an entirely different 
deposit in the amounts of $30,000 and $50,000, respectively. Under these 
circumstances, the taxpayer may deduct or defer exploration expenditures 
paid or incurred in the amount of $100,000 for 1956. No deduction or 
deferral is allowable to the taxpayer for expenditures made in 1957, 
1958, and 1959 since the 4-year limitation of paragraph (a) applies. The 
taxpayer may deduct or defer a maximum of $100,000 for 1961 since the 4-
year limitation of paragraph (a) of this section no longer applies. If 
the taxpayer deducted or deferred $100,000 for each of the years 1956 
and 1961 and also made exploration expenditures in 1962, the taxpayer 
may deduct or defer a maximum of $60,000 for that year under the 
$400,000 limitation of paragraph (b) of this section.
    Example 3. In 1957, A and B transfer assets to a corporation under 
circumstances making section 351 applicable to such a transfer. Among 
the assets transferred by A is a mineral lease with respect to certain 
coal lands. A has deducted exploration expenditures under section 615 
for the years 1954 and 1956 in the amounts of $50,000 and $100,000, 
respectively, made with respect to other deposits not included in the 
transfer to the corporation. The corporation shall be required to take 
into account the deductions previously made by A for purposes of 
applying the limitations of paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section.
    Example 4. In 1956, A, B, and C form a partnership for the purpose 
of exploring for, developing, and producing uranium. A contributes a 
uranium lease to the partnership. A had individually made exploration 
expenses in the amount of $50,000 and $100,000 with respect to other 
mineral properties not contributed to the partnership and which he has 
deducted under section 615(a) for the years 1954 and 1955, respectively. 
B contributes a uranium lease to the partnership on which he made 
exploration expenditures in the amount of $100,000 in 1955 which he 
elected to defer under section 615(b). This is the only year in which B 
has used section 615. C contributes only cash to the partnership and has 
not previously used section 615. Subject to the limitations of section 
615, for taxable years beginning before July 7, 1960, A may deduct or 
defer exploration expenses for two more taxable years (either as to 
expenditures incurred by him individually or with respect to his 
distributive share of partnership exploration expenses). B may deduct or 
defer exploration expenditures for three more years, and C may deduct or 
defer exploration expenditures for four years. For taxable years 
beginning after July 6, 1960, subject in each case to the $100,000 
limitation per year, A may deduct or defer exploration expenditures in 
an amount not in excess of $250,000 ($400,000-$150,000), either as to 
expenditures incurred by him individually or with respect to his 
distributive share of partnership exploration expenditures. B may 
similarly deduct or defer exploration expenditures in an

[[Page 514]]

amount not in excess of $300,000 ($400,000-$100,000), and C may deduct 
or defer exploration expenditures in an amount not in excess of 
$400,000.

[T.D. 6685, 28 FR 11405, Oct. 24, 1963; as amended by T.D. 7192, 37 FR 
12939, June 30, 1972