[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 10]
[Revised as of April 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 26CFR1.956-3T]

[Page 358-360]
 
                       TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
 
    CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 
                               (CONTINUED)
 
PART 1_INCOME TAXES--Table of Contents
 
Sec. 1.956-3T  Certain trade or service receivables acquired from United 
States persons (temporary).

    (a) In general. For purposes of section 956(a) and Sec. 1.956-1, 
the term ``United States property'' also includes any trade or service 
receivable if the trade or service receivable is acquired (directly or 
indirectly) after March 1, 1984, from a related person who is a United 
States person (as defined in section 7701(a)(30)) (hereinafter referred 
to as a ``related United States person'') and the obligor under the 
receivable is a United States person. A trade or service receivable 
described in this paragraph shall be considered to be United States 
property notwithstanding the exceptions (other than subparagraph (H)) 
contained in section 956(b)(2). The terms ``trade or service 
receivable'' and ``related person'' have the respective meanings given 
to such terms by section 864(d) and the regulations thereunder. For 
purposes of this section, the exception contained in Sec. 1.956-
2T(d)(2)(i)(B) for short-term obligations shall not apply to service 
receivables described in this paragraph.
    (b) Acquisition of a trade or service receivable--(1) General rule. 
The rules of Sec. 1.864-8T(c)(1) shall be applied to determine whether 
a controlled foreign corporation has acquired a trade or service 
receivable.
    (2) Indirect acquisitions--(i) Acquisition through unrelated person. 
A trade or service receivable will be considered to be acquired from a 
related person if it is acquired from an unrelated person who acquired 
(directly or indirectly) such receivable from a person who is a related 
person to the acquiring person.
    (ii) Acquisition by nominee or pass-through entity. A controlled 
foreign corporation will be considered to have acquired a trade or 
service receivable of a related United States person held on its behalf:
    (A) By a nominee or by a partnership, simple trust, S corporation or 
other pass-through entity to the extent the controlled foreign 
corporation owns (directly or indirectly) a beneficial interest in such 
partnership or other pass-through entity; or
    (B) By another foreign corporation that is controlled by the 
controlled foreign corporation, if one of the principal

[[Page 359]]

purposes for creating, organizing, or funding such other foreign 
corporation (through capital contributions or debt) is to avoid the 
application of section 956. See Sec. 1.956-1T.

The rule of this paragraph (b)(2)(ii) does not limit the application of 
paragraph (b)(2)(iii) of this section regarding the characterization of 
trade or service receivables of unrelated persons acquired pursuant to 
certain swap or pooling arrangements. The following examples illustrate 
the application of this paragraph (b)(2)(ii).

    Example 1. FS1, a controlled foreign corporation with substantial 
accumulated earnings and profits, contributes $2,000,000 to PS, a 
partnership, in exchange for a 20 percent limited partnership interest 
in PS. PS purchases trade or service receivables of FS1's domestic 
parent, P. The obligors under the receivables are United States persons. 
PS does not purchase receivables of any person who is related to any 
other partner in PS. Under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(A) of this section, 
there is an investment of the earnings of FS1 in United States property 
equal to 20 percent of PS's basis in the receivables of P.
    Example 2. FS1, a controlled foreign corporation, has accumulated 
more than $3,000,000 in earnings and profits. It organizes a wholly-
owned foreign corporation, FS2, with a $2,000,000 equity contribution. 
FS2 has no earnings and profits. FS2 uses the funds to purchase trade or 
service receivables of FS1's domestic parent, P. The obligors under the 
receivables are United States persons. Under paragraph (b)(2)(ii)(B) of 
this section, there is an investment of the earnings of FS1 in United 
States property equal to $2,000,000.

    (iii) Swap or pooling arrangements. A trade or service receivable of 
an unrelated person will be considered to be a trade or service 
receivable acquired from a related United States person and subject to 
the rules of this section if it is acquired in accordance with an 
arrangement that involves two or more groups of related persons that are 
unrelated to each other and the effect of the arrangement is that one or 
more related persons in each group acquire (directly or indirectly) 
trade or service receivables of one or more unrelated United States 
persons who are also parties to the arrangement, in exchange for 
reciprocal purchases of receivables of United States persons in the 
first group. The following example illustrates the application of this 
paragraph (b)(2)(iii).

    Example. Controlled foreign corporations A, B, C, and D are wholly-
owned subsidiaries of domestic corporations M, N, O, and P, 
respectively. M, N, O, and P are not re lated persons. According to a 
prearranged plan, A, B, C, and D each acquire trade or service 
receivables of M, N, O, and/or P. The obligors under some or all of the 
re ceivables acquired by each of A, B, C, and D are United States 
persons. Because the effect of this arrange ment is that the unrelated 
groups acquire each other's trade or service receivables of United 
States persons pursuant to the ar rangement, there is an investment of 
the earnings of each of A, B, C, and D in United States property to the 
extent of the purchase price of those receivables under which the 
obligors are United States persons.

    (iv) Financing arrangements. If a con trolled foreign corporation 
participates (directly or indirectly) in a lending transaction that 
results in a loan to a United States person who purchases property 
described in section 1221(1) (hereinafter referred to as ``inventory 
property'') or services of a related United States person, or to any 
person who purchases trade or service receiv ables of a related United 
States person under which the obligor is a United States person, or to a 
person who is re lated to any such purchaser, and if the loan would not 
have been made or maintained on the same terms but for the corresponding 
purchase, then the controlled foreign corporation shall be considered to 
have indirectly acquired a trade or service receivable described in 
paragraph (a) of this section. For purposes of this paragraph 
(b)(2)(iv), it is immaterial that the sums lent are not, in fact, the 
sums used to finance the purchase of the inventory property or services 
or trade or service receiv ables of a related United States person. The 
amount to be taken into account with respect to the controlled foreign 
corporation's investment in United States property (resulting from 
application of this paragraph (b)(2)(iv)) shall be the amount lent 
pursuant to a lend ing transaction described in this para graph 
(b)(2)(iv), if the amount lent is equal to or less than the pur chase 
price of the inventory property, services, or trade or service 
receivables. If the amount lent is greater than the purchase price of 
the inventory property, services or receivables, the amount to

[[Page 360]]

be taken into account shall be the pur chase price. The following 
examples il lustrate the application of this para graph (b)(2)(iv).

    Example 1. P, a domestic corporation, owns all of the outstanding 
stock of FS1, a con trolled foreign corporation. P sells equip ment for 
$2,000,000 to X, an unrelated United States person. FS1 makes a 
$1,000,000 short-term loan to X, which loan would not have been made or 
maintained on the same terms but for X's purchase of P's equipment. Be 
cause FS1 directly participates in a lending transaction described in 
this paragraph (b)(2)(iv), FS1 is considered to have acquired the 
receivable of a related United States per son. Thus, there is an 
investment of FS1's earnings and profits in United States prop erty in 
the amount of $1,000,000.
    Example 2. The facts are the same as in Ex ample 1, except that 
instead of loaning money to X directly, FS1 deposits $3,000,000 with an 
unrelated financial institution that loans $2,000,000 to X in order for 
X to pur chase P's equipment. The loan would not have been made or 
maintained on the same terms but for the corresponding deposit. Ac 
cordingly, the deposit and the loan are treat ed as a direct loan from 
FS1 to X. See Rev. Rul. 87-89, 1987-37 I.R.B. 16. Because FS1 indi 
rectly participates in a lending transaction described in this paragraph 
(b)(2)(iv), FS1 is considered to have acquired the receivable of a 
related United States person. Thus, there is an investment of FS1's 
earnings and prof its in United States property in the amount of 
$2,000,000.
    Example 3. P, a domestic corporation, owns all of the outstanding 
stock of FS1, a con trolled foreign corporation. FS1 makes a $3,000,000 
loan to U, an unrelated foreign cor poration, in connection with U's 
purchase for $2,000,000 of receivables from the sale of in ventory 
property by P to United States obli gors. Because FS1 directly 
participates in a lending transaction described in this para graph 
(b)(2)(iv), FS1 is considered to have ac quired receivables of a related 
United States person. Thus, there is an investment of FS1's earnings and 
profits in United States prop erty in the amount of $2,000,000.

    (c) Substitution of obligor. For pur poses of this section, the 
substitution of another person for a United States obligor may be 
disregarded. Thus, if a purchaser who is a United States per son 
arranges for a foreign person to pay a United States seller of inventory 
property or services and the seller transfers by sale or otherwise to 
its own controlled foreign corporation the foreign person's obligation 
for pay ment, then the acquisition of the for eign person's obligation 
shall con stitute an investment in United States property by the 
seller's controlled foreign corporation, unless it can be demonstrated 
by the parties to the transaction that the primary purpose for the 
arrangement was not the avoidance of section 956. The following example 
illustrates the application of this paragraph.

    Example. P, a domestic corporation, owns all of the outstanding 
stock of FS1, a controlled foreign corporation with substantial 
accumulated earnings and profits. P sells equipment to X, a domestic 
corporation unrelated to P. To pay for the equipment, X arranges for a 
foreign financing entity to issue a note to P. P then sells the note to 
FS1. FS1 has made an investment in United States property in the amount 
of the purchase price of the note.

[T.D. 8209, 53 FR 22169, June 14, 1988]