[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 17]
[Revised as of April 1, 2004]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access
[CITE: 26CFR53.4943-2]

[Page 109-112]
 
                       TITLE 26--INTERNAL REVENUE
 
    CHAPTER I--INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 
                               (CONTINUED)
 
PART 53_FOUNDATION AND SIMILAR EXCISE TAXES--Table of Contents
 
               Subpart D_Taxes on Excess Business Holdings
 
Sec. 53.4943-2  Imposition of tax on excess business holdings of private 
foundations.

    (a) Imposition of initial tax--(1) In general--(i) Initial tax. 
Section 4943(a)(1) imposes an initial excise tax (the ``initial tax'') 
on the excess business holdings of a private foundation for each taxable 
year of the foundation which ends during the taxable period defined in 
section 4943(d)(2). The amount of such tax is equal to 5 percent of the 
total value of all the private foundation's excess business holdings in 
each of its business enterprises. In determining the value of the excess 
business holdings of the foundation subject to tax under section 4943, 
the rules set forth in Sec. Sec. 20.2031-1 through 20.2031-3 of this 
chapter (Estate Tax Regulations) shall apply.
    (ii) Disposition of certain excess business holdings within ninety 
days. In any case in which a private foundation acquires excess business 
holdings, other than as a result of a purchase by the foundation, the 
foundation shall not be subject to the taxes imposed by section 4943, 
but only if it disposes of an amount of its holdings so that it no 
longer has such excess business holdings within 90 days from the date on 
which it knows, or has reason to know, of the event which caused it to 
have such excess business holdings. Similarly, a private foundation 
shall not be subject to the taxes imposed by section

[[Page 110]]

4943 because of its purchase of holdings where it did not know, or have 
reason to know of prior acquisitions by disqualified persons, but only 
if the foundation disposes of its excess holdings within the 90-day 
period described previously, and its purchase would not have created 
excess business holding but for such prior acquisitions by disqualified 
persons. In determining whether for purposes of this (ii) the foundation 
has disposed of such excess business holdings during such 90-day period, 
any disposition of holdings, by a disqualified person during such period 
shall be disregarded.
    (iii) Extension of ninety day period. The period described in 
paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, during which no tax shall be 
imposed under section 4943, shall be extended to include the period 
during which a foundation is prevented by federal or state securities 
laws from disposing of such excess business holdings.
    (iv) Effect of disposition subject to material restrictions. If a 
private foundation disposes of an interest in a business enterprise but 
imposes any material restrictions or conditions that prevent the 
transferee from freely and effectively using or disposing of the 
transferred interest, then the transferor foundation will be treated as 
owning such interest until all such restrictions or conditions are 
eliminated (regardless of whether the transferee is treated for other 
purposes of the Code as owning such interest from the date of the 
transfer). However, a restriction or condition imposed in compliance 
with federal or state securities laws, or in accordance with the terms 
or conditions of the gift or bequest through which such interest was 
acquired by the foundation, shall not be considered a material 
restriction or condition imposed by a private foundation.
    (v) Foundation knowledge of acquisitions made by disqualified 
persons. (A) For purposes of paragraph (a)(1)(ii) of this section, 
whether a private foundation will be treated as knowing, or having 
reason to know, of the acquisition of holdings by a disqualified person 
will depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. Factors which 
will be considered relevant to a determination that a private foundation 
did not know or had no reason to know of an acquisition are: the fact 
that it did not discover acquisitions made by disqualified persons 
through the use of procedures reasonably calculated to discover such 
holdings; the diversity of foundation holdings; and the existence of 
large numbers of disqualified persons who have little or no contact with 
the foundation or its managers.
    (B) The provisions of paragraph (a)(1)(v)(A) of this section may be 
illustrated by the following example:

    Example. By the fifteenth day of the fifth month after the close of 
each taxable year, the F Foundation sends to each foundation manager, 
substantial contributor, person holding more than a 20% interest (as 
described in section 4946(a)(1)(C) in a substantial contributor, and 
foundation described in section 4946(a)(1)(H), a questionnaire asking 
such persons to list all holdings, actual or constructive, in each 
business enterprise in which F had holdings during the taxable year in 
excess of those permitted by the 2 percent de minimis rule of section 
4943(c)(2)(C). In preparing the list of such enterprises, F takes into 
account its constructive holdings only if, during the taxable year, F 
(along with all related foundations described in section 4946(a)(1)(H)) 
owned over 2% of the voting stock, profits interest or beneficial 
interest in the entity actually owning the holdings constructively held 
by F. The questionnaire asks each such person to list the holdings in 
such enterprises of any persons who, because of their relationship to 
such disqualified person, were themselves disqualified persons (i.e., 
members of the family (as defined in section 4946(d)), and any 
corporations, partnerships, trusts and estates described in section 
4946(a)(1) (E) through (G) in which such person, or members of his 
family, had an interest). The questionnaire asks that constructive 
holdings be listed only if, during the taxable year, the disqualified 
person owned over 2% of the voting stock, profits interest or beneficial 
interest in the entity actually owning the holdings constructively held 
by such person. (Thus a disqualified person owning less than 2% of a 
mutual fund is not required to list his attributed share of all the 
securities in the portfolio of the fund.) If no response to the 
questionnaire is received, the foundation seeks the information 
requested by the questionnaire by mailing a second (but not a third) 
questionnaire. If a questionnaire which is returned to the foundation 
indicates that certain information was unavailable to the person 
completing the questionnaire, the foundation seeks that information 
directly. For example, if a disqualified person indicates that he could 
not find out whether a

[[Page 111]]

corporation described in section 4946(a)(1)(E) had holdings in the 
enterprise listed in the questionnaire, the foundation seeks to obtain 
this information directly from the corporation by mailing it a 
questionnaire. In such a case F may be found not to have reason to know 
of the acquisition of holdings by a disqualified person.

    (vi) Holdings acquired other than by purchases. See section 
4943(c)(6) and Sec. 53.4943-6 for rules relating to the acquisition of 
certain holdings other than by purchase by the foundation or a 
disqualified person.
    (2) Special rules. In applying subparagraph (1) of this paragraph, 
the tax imposed by section 4943(a)(1):
    (i) Shall be imposed on the last day of the private foundation's 
taxable year, but
    (ii) The amount of such tax and the value of the excess business 
holdings subject to such tax shall be determined with respect to the 
foundation's holdings (based upon voting power, profits or beneficial 
interest, or value, whichever is applicable) in any business enterprise 
as of that day during the foundation's taxable year when the 
foundation's excess holdings in such enterprise were the greatest.

In applying subdivision (ii) of this subparagraph, if a foundation's 
excess business holdings in a business enterprise which constitute such 
foundation's greatest excess holdings in such enterprise for any taxable 
year are maintained for 2 or more days during such taxable year, the 
value of such excess holdings which is subject to tax under section 
4943(a)(1) shall be the greatest value of such excess holdings in such 
enterprise as of any day on which such greatest excess holdings are 
maintained during such taxable year.
    (3) Examples. The provisions of this paragraph may be illustrated by 
the following examples:

    Example (1). Y is a private foundation reporting on a calendar year 
basis. On January 1, 1973, Y has 20 shares of common stock in 
corporation N, of which five shares constitute excess business holdings. 
On June 1, 1973, Y disposes of such five shares; however, because of 
additional acquisitions of N common stock on such date by disqualified 
persons with respect to Y, the remaining 15 shares of N common stock 
held by Y now constitute excess business holdings. There are no further 
acquisitions or dispositions of N common stock during 1973 by Y or its 
disqualified persons. Although Y's greatest holdings in N during 1973 
are held between January 1, 1973, and May 31, 1973, Y's greatest excess 
holdings in N during 1973 are held between June 1, 1973, and December 
31, 1973. Therefore, the tax specified in section 4943(a)(1) shall be 
computed on the basis of the greatest value of such greatest excess 
holdings as of any day between June 1 and December 31, 1973.
    Example (2). X is a private foundation reporting on a calendar year 
basis. On January 1, 1972, X has 100 shares of common stock in M 
corporation which are excess business holdings. On such date each share 
of M common stock has a fair market value of $100. On February 28, 1972, 
in an effort to dispose of such excess business holdings, X sells 70 
shares of M common stock for $120 per share (the fair market value of 
each share on such date) to A, an individual who is not a disqualified 
person within the meaning of section 4946(a). The value of $120 per 
share is the highest fair market value between January 1 and February 
28, 1972. X disposes of no more stock in M for the reminder of calendar 
year 1972. On December 31, 1972, the fair market value of each share of 
M common stock is $80. X calculates its tax on its excess business 
holdings in M for 1972 as follows:

100 shares of M common stock times $120 fair market value        $12,000
 per share as of Feb. 28, 1972..............................
$12,000 multiplied by rate of tax (percent).................           5
Amount of tax on X foundation's excess business holdings for        $600
 1972.......................................................


    Example (3). Assume the same facts as in Example (2) except that the 
sale of X to A occurs on January 7, 1973, when the fair market value of 
each share of M corporation common stock equals $70. A value of $100 per 
share is the highest fair market value of the M common stock between 
January 1 and January 7, 1973. On may 9, 1973, X for the first time has 
excess business holdings in N corporation in the form of 200 shares of N 
common stock. The value per share of N common stock on May 9, 1973, 
equals $200. X makes no disposition of the N common stock during 1973, 
and the value of each share of N common stock as of December 31, 1973 
equals $250 (the highest value of N common stock during 1973). X 
calculates its tax on its excess business holdings in both M and N for 
1973 as follows:

100 shares of M common stock times $100 fair market value        $10,000
 per share..................................................
  $250 fair market value per share..........................     $50,000
    Total...................................................     $60,000
                                                             -----------
    Total...................................................     $60,000
$60,000 multiplied by rate of tax (percent).................           5
Amount of tax on X foundation's excess business holdings for      $3,000
 1973.......................................................


    (b) Additional tax. In any case in which the initial tax is imposed 
under

[[Page 112]]

section 4943(a) with respect to the holdings of a private foundation in 
any business enterprise, if, at the close of the taxable period (as 
defined in section 4943(d)(2) and Sec. 53.4943-9) with respect to such 
holdings the foundation still has excess business holdings in such 
enterprise, there is imposed a tax under section 4943(b) equal to 200 
percent of the value of such excess holdings as of the last day of the 
taxable period.

[T.D. 7496, 42 FR 46285, Sept. 15, 1977, as amended by T.D. 8084, 51 FR 
16302, May 2, 1986]