|
Thanks to data
mining, tax law is simple.
Really, there are only two fundamental
subjects:
- Excluded income
or "income that is ... exempt"
- Taxable income
or "income that is not ... exempt"

Ultimately, all income is either
excluded income
or taxable
income.
Also notice, the tax is just some percentage of taxable
income, not a percentage of all incomes.
Data mining the code will produce
the following...
1.
Law: Tax imposed
"There is hereby imposed
on the taxable income of every individual...a
tax" - 26
USC Sec. 1
2. Taxable income
"In general
... the term ``taxable income'' means gross income minus
the deductions" - 26
USC Sec. 63
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
Taxes, Too Complicated?
The Supreme Court
has said, it is a "well-settled rule
that the citizen is exempt from taxation unless
the same is imposed by clear and unequivocal language,
and that where the construction of a tax law is
doubtful, the doubt is to be resolved in favor
of those upon whom the tax is sought to be laid"
- 192
U.S. 397, p-416

News commentator Paul
Harvey, on January 22, 2007, explains how
this Supreme Courst decision was put into action:
"Now for what it's
worth, the 9th circuit panel in San Francisco
has been reversed. The Internal Revenue Service,
the IRS, has ruled that Valerie and Robert McKee
owed the government $31,000 in unpaid taxes, until
Valerie and Robert demonstrated in court that
the tax law is so complex nobody can understand
it. The court had to agree that
the law was indeed so complex that nobody can
understand it, and the court reversed itself,
and the IRS gets the bill. The government also
sought and got us...ha ha ha (laugh)... your government
also tried to get a stipulation that this verdict
would not be made public, but it just was... Paul
Harvey, Good Day!!"
Case Information:
ROBERT C. MCKEE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
No. 04-74846
IRS No. 4036-03
-- To hear this Paul Harvey sound clip and more,
visit HearLiberty.com
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
3. Gross income
"Except as otherwise
provided in this subtitle, gross income means all income
from whatever source derived" - 26
USC Sec. 61
* But, tax is still "imposed on the taxable income",
not gross income.
4. Except as otherwise provided
"Items of gross income, expenses,
losses, and deductions, other than those specified
in sections 861(a) and 862(a), shall be allocated or apportioned
to sources within or without the United States, under
regulations prescribed by the Secretary." - 26
USC Sec. 863
- What happened to deductions? Why are deductions located
under regulations? [And, why is the Treasury Secretary allowed
to make the law, in regulations?]
- There are more items of gross income? What kind
of "Items" shall be allocated "under
regulations prescribed by the Secretary"?
5. Under regulations prescribed

"(a) Gross income means all income
from whatever source derived, unless excluded by law."
"(b) ...To the extent that another section of the Code or
of the regulations thereunder, provides specific treatment for
any item of income, such other provision shall apply notwithstanding
section 61 and the regulations thereunder."
- 26
CFR Sec. 1.61-1
So, notwithstanding [in spite of] what section 61
says about "all income", if "another section of
the Code or of the regulations ... provides specific treatment
for any item of income", it shall apply.

- "unless excluded by law"? - Then what
is excluded income?
- Where are the deductions?
- What section provides "specific treatment for any
item of income"?
6. Specific treatment for any item of income
[e.g. taxable income, gross income, excluded income, eliminated
income, exempt income, expenses, losses, and other deductions]
Search for:
-
"how to determine taxable income"
- 26
CFR Sec. 1.861-8(a)(1)
- "specific sources" - Sec. 1.861-8(a)(1)
- "specific guidance" - Sec. 1.861-8(a)(1)
- "excluded income" - Sec. 1.861-8 and
1.861-8T
"deductions
to excluded income" - Sec. 1.861-8(a)(4)
- "eliminated income" - Sec. 1.861-8(d),
and 1.861-8(d)(2), and 1.861-8T(d)(2)
- "eliminated items" - Sec. 1.861-8T(d)
- "exempt, excluded, or eliminated income" -
Sec. 1.861-8(d)(2)
"exempt,
eliminated, or excluded income" - Sec.
1.861-8T(d)(2)(iii)
- "the sources of income for purposes of the income tax" -
Sec. 1.861-1(a)
"income
that is exempt or excluded" - Sec. 1.861-8T(d)(2)
- "gross income may include excluded income" -
Sec. 1.861-8(b)(1)
- "specific rules for allocation and apportionment of deductions"
- Sec. 1.861-8(a)(5)(ii)
- "expenses, losses, or other deductions" -
Sec. 1.861-8T(d)(2)(iii)

"income that is not considered tax exempt" -
Sec. 1.861-8T(d)(2)(iii) - the list of taxable items ("Income
... not ... exempt")
There are more specific rules written in section 861. Also see
boolean search
results in regulations, and the search results from statutes
- according
to law and who
is taxed.
Specific
sources, specific guidance, excluded income, eliminated income,
and even eliminated items are prescribed in Sec.
861.
The "specific treatment for any item"
is written in section 861.
Deductions and Excluded Income
For "deductions to excluded income", regulations
say "See paragraph (d)(2)." Then, in Sec. 1.861-8(d)(2),
it says:
Allocation and apportionment to exempt, excluded, or eliminated
income. [Reserved] For guidance, see Sec. 1.861-8T(d)(2).
So, "For guidance", with "exempt, excluded, or eliminated
income", we're told, "see Sec. 1.861-8T(d)(2)".
Thus, the obvious questions:
- What is exempt?

- What is not exempt?
Both of these are prescribed exclusively in CFR 1.861-8T(d)(2).
|
What is exempt?
"Exempt income and exempt asset
defined--(A) In general. For purposes of this section, the
term exempt income means any income that is,
in whole or in part, exempt, excluded,
or eliminated for federal income tax purposes."
- CFR
Sec. 1.861-8T(d)(2)(ii)
|

Excluded income
"income that is ...exempt"
|
|
What is not ... exempt?
"Income that is not
considered tax exempt. The following
items are not considered to be exempt, eliminated, or excluded
income and, thus, may have expenses, losses, or other deductions
allocated and apportioned to them:"
- 26
CFR Sec. 1.861-8T(d)(2)(iii)
|

Taxable income
"income that is not...exempt"
|
This is the list of taxable income, located in 26
CFR Sec. 1.861-8T(d)(2)(iii).
Here is what this really says, in plain English...
 |
 |
 |
 |
"Income
that is not considered tax exempt [income that
is taxable]. The following items are
[...taxable income] and, thus, may
have expenses, losses, and other deductions allocated
and apportioned to them:
(A) "a foreign taxpayer... gross income (whether domestic
or foreign source)"
[e.g. "all income from whatever source"]
(B) "gross income of a DISC or a FSC"
[Domestic International Sales or Foreign
Sales Corporation]
(C) "gross income of a possessions corporations"
[Possessions are places like Puerto
Rico, Virgin Islands, etc]
(D) "Foreign earned income"
[The requirements for making foreign
earned income are greater than you think. Search for the definition
of "foreign earned income"]
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
A search technique called a boolean
search confirms this is the list of taxable income. Even "exempt
income" is defined immediately before the list. And, everything
listed is applicable only to foreign related incomes.
* Notice, domestic income has been excluded from the
list ("excluded by law"), thus, domestic income
is not taxable.
We were told to expect this, by the statutes...
"Except as otherwise provided"
- 26
USC Sec. 61
and by the regulations...
"all income from whatever
source ...
unless excluded by law" - 26
CFR Sec. 1.61-1(a).
Domestic
income is not in the list of taxable income, it has been excluded
by law.
A doubter would say, "But, it doesn't say domestic income
is excluded".
It doesn't have to, it's already the accepted condition in (all)
statutory construction:
Evidently, it's easier to list what is taxable, than to list
what is not taxable.
Gross income "means
all income from whatever source".
But, the tax is "imposed on the taxable
income".
Taxable Income
The only item in the list of "income that is not ...
exempt" applicable to most citizens is item D. If you
make "foreign earned income", this means you.
However, most Americans do not have any "foreign
earned income".
Thus, according to code, most Americans do not owe any federal
income tax, because most of their income has been "excluded
by law."

Congress; Secretary; IRS; Judges:
If Sec. 861 is frivolous, then where is the law? What is the
number of the statute, or regulation, requiring
an income tax from US citizens? Thousands of people, including
your own IRS
agents, have asked you this before, many times, but you, and
IRS
Commissioner, Mark Everson, have ignored the question. What
is the number?
If section 861 is not the law, simply produce the statute or
regulation number.
Explain yourselves.
Either, there is a law, or you've all been lying. (Imagine, politicians
and bureaucrats, lying)
"everyone who does evil hates the light, and
doesn't come to the light, lest his works would be exposed. But
he who does the truth comes to the light, that his works may be
revealed..."
- John 3:20-21
The
truth is, tax law is so simple a child could figure it out. It
shouldn't be long before many of them do. (If teenagers can hack
into NASA, the Air Force, government computers, etc, they can
easily figure out a simple tax code.)
- CNN:
Teen charged with hacking into Air Force system
- PBS:
Interview: anonymous. Young hacker caught breaking into NASA's
computers
- Zdnet:
Teen hacks 27 ISPs, gains root access
- Cooltech:
Another teen hacks NASA
The Code does not lie, but judges, politicians, and bureaucrats
do.
Congressmen Ron
Paul knows the income tax, and the Federal Reserve are a scam.
Yet, the Congress, Secretary, and judges, enforce what is clearly
a fraud.
The Code remains, still precise, impartial, and truthful.
The conflict of interest involved with judges who are payed
by the same system which prosecutes does not simply vanish at
the bench. This is not justice. What should we expect a tax judge
to say, "Take my job away"? Only under color
of law do they rule.
Even
after one million frivolous rulings, you will not be able to avoid
section 861, the truth is manifest. It will always return to the
courts because code does not lie.
The slaves are waking up, and the masters will not be able
to hide from millions of angry former-slaves.
All of the Titles of Law are suspect of color of law, and candidates
for data mining.
|