The Solution - As easy as 1, 2, 3 ...

"Foreign earned income? ... Are you sure?"

1. Search Search the tax laws and regulations. Begin in regulations by looking for simple, common-sense items, e.g. "excluded income", "eliminated income", "eliminated items". Also look at boolean results, such as these. Then search the laws, to see what is taxed according to law. You'll find that Sec. 861 cannot be avoided.

2. Diagram Be sure you know what you're talking about. Diagram the objects involved. Drawing the objects, and connecting them, will help to better understand the so-called "Tax imposed". Once you can identify exactly where the Income Tax is misapplied, then ...

IRS, Congressmen, Senators, Judges, Mr. President, Fed Bankers, Konsortialführer: The Code does not lie! Your fraud has been detected ...and exposed! The jig is up!

3. Use Your Freedom of Speech Tell your friends and neighbors. But, most importantly, tell your Congressmen, Senators, and the rest of government. Phone them. Email them. Show them, that a computer search of tax laws will produce the same section number as a search of tax regulations, and that result is Sec. 861. The same section which judges call frivolous. If you think your friend or neighbor is just too lazy to read, show them some code results with a 5 min. video. Explain how easy it is to filter through all tax regulations, and statutes, in order to find every desired subject. Example: According to the government's own search engine, "excluded income" is written in just seven (7) regulations. ecfr.gpoaccess.gov So, it isn't necessary to read thousands of pages of code, in order to know everything there is to know about "excluded income".

(Did you know... Income tax does not pay for any government services?)

Eventually, a critical mass of people will form and take care of their problem of being slaves (yes, people who are forced to pay are slaves. It's even withheld from you in advance, just like a slave). Those responsible for this will be caught, and provided justice. Everyone taking part in this treason has a name and address, and there is nowhere to hide from millions of angry slaves.

While the critical mass develops, you can also do some data mining to see what other laws our servants are breaking, and fabricating. You can expose the corruption and color of law you find in other Titles (or more from Internal Revenue) by making a website and telling others about your data mining results. Be sure to search corresponding regulations (for example, 26USC861 = 26CFR1.861).

Americans who have not read their tax laws and regulations must be educated with actual written code, not with spoken assumptions. Laws are not passed down verbally, our laws are written. Read what they really say.

If you wish, you can also download this website (version 3) and re-serve it, re-word it, re-do it, whatever, on your website.

Every citizen has a duty to know the law and should because it takes a village to catch all of the bad guys who have been acting under color of law, stealing our money.

Not every country has freedom of speech.
Do your duty, speak.

Evil continues when the good do nothing, right?

What else should the People know?

- Jury nullification. It is critical to keep this right in mind...

"you have nevertheless a right to take upon yourselves to judge of both, and to determine the law as well as the fact in controversy... it is presumed, that juries are the best judges of facts; it is, on the other hand, presumbable (sic), that the court are the best judges of the law. But still both are lawfully, within your power of decision."

-- Supreme Court Justice John Jay - instructions for the jury in Georgia v. Brailsford, 3 US 1, making it clear to the jury that average citizens within a jury have the Right, and the Power to decide when laws in question are unjust and unlawful.

Encyclopedia:
See Wikipedia: Jury Nullification

Dictionary:
"a jury does not have to be instructed on the possibility of jury nullification" - http://dictionary.lp.findlaw.com.

It's true, judges do not have to tell you (instruct you) about it, they should, but even today's legal dictionaries will admit jury nullification exists. With Jury nullification, it is "We the People" who have the ultimate duty of ensuring lawmakers do not make unjust laws. We the people can approve or disapprove of the impositions upon us.

Have you been called to Jury Duty?

Learn what you can expect, and learn some history about juries before you go to court. See Fully Informed Jury Association and do some googling on jury duty history. The good news is that jurors cannot be punished for their verdicts, and you do not have to give any reason for your decision. The bad news is that you will not even get on the jury if you seem familiar with politics, law, or rights, including jury nullification. Pretending to be ignorant may actually put you on the jury.

Why is Jury Nullification a Right?

Every journalism student knows the trial of John Zenger, in which the jury was actually informed of their right to jury nullification. However, the journalists are too interested now in their own financial security to tell you about this right.

Today, the entire system has been corrupted. Your right to jury nullification is now equated with drugs, tax pro-testers, gun owners, and abortion foes. Notice anything in common, and did you notice in the last link - at least three states have Jury Nullification written in their Constitutions, but instead we're told the practice fell into disfavor, simply because it is frowned upon since it ruffles the robes of the Supremes.

Jury Nullification is a right, only you aren't told that you have it. (Hijacked by men in black robes, and others who prefer paramilitary dress)

- The Judge

Who pays a judge? In tax cases who pays the plaintiff? Is there a conflict of interest? Why would either risk the security of the system? Can this ever be fair?

Judges instruct juries, but a juror needs to keep in mind that - If it's not written in Code, it's just judicial rhetoric. The Code is the law, and opinions are not. Even if it is in the Code and the jury doesn't like it, the jury can still toss it in the trash, using jury nullification.

- Attorneys & Clients

Who does your attorney work for?

Source: Corpus Juris Secundum, Attorney & Client, Vol. 7 Sec. 3, p. 666-667, © 2004 Thomson West. An encyclopledia of American law - ("how certain ideas have been applied in case law."):

• First duty owed to court
  1. "An attorney owes his or her first duty to the court, since the attorney assumed his or her obligations toward it before ever having a client."
     -- Ohio-- 754 N.E.2d 219 (Ohio, 2001)
  
  
  2. "Attorneys are officers of the court, before having their first client, and are deemed to have responsibilities as such which precede their duties to their client."
     -- Okla.-- 778 P.2d 920 (Okla.Crim.App. 1989)
     -- Ga.-- 444 S.E.2d 314 (Ga. 1994)
     -- U.S.-- 393 F. Supp. 1056 (E.D. La. 1975)
     -- Wis.-- 34 Wis. 2d 559, 150 N.W.2d 387, 35 A.L.R.3d 377 (1967)

• Duties to court
  1. "A lawyer is an officer of the court"
     -- ILL.-- 219 ILL. App. 3d 602, 162 ILL. Dec. 76, 579 N.E.2d 890 (1st Dist. 1991)
  
  
  2. "Attorneys, as officers of the court, have a duty to cooperate with the court to preserve... our system"
     -- Iowa-- 580 F. Supp. 913 (N.D. Iowa 1983), judgement aff'd, 724 F.2d 630 (8th Cir. 1984)

Preserve whose system? Attorneys that do not co-operate are fined, sanctioned, and face disbarment for not fulfilling their first duty. You, the client, will forever be second duty.

Right to a 'fair' trial? ... Pfff, Where?

Without a well-informed jury, aware of its jury nullification rights, the so-called 'offenders' are quickly sent to prison by a well-organized (crime) system. Whose system is being preserved?

A New Improved Order

The actual solution requires an "open source" code fix, an update to our entire Constitutional system, beginning with a re-Declaration of Independence and updating the code in the Constitution and Bill of Rights. The country's current code has been hacked by an organized-crime system, and needs the proper code patches to preserve freedom, for the People.

An Open Source team of information system designers, historians, constitutional experts, even including everyone on the planet with an Internet connection, could identify the bugs and update the code, in the Constitution and Bill of Rights, and all of the Titles of Law desired.

Imagine if the Founding Fathers had the benefit of millions of people to identify the weaknesses in their 'code.' The benefit of an Open Source project would be many eyeballs focusing on and identifying the ever present flaws that lurk in every system.

The open source end-result would be a system which any country could adopt if they wanted to keep out system viruses, spyware (usually government officials and their owners), and design errors. This solution, "A New Improved Order," which would be based on the US Constitution would have a goal of greater de-centralization of power.

The Problem

Our country was probably subverted not too long after, or maybe even before, it began. Some very wise system designers knew that subvertion was a natural occurrence and were able to secure, in writing, essential Rights (Amendments), including Freedom of Speech, to expose 'leaders' who didn't obey the law.

Notice, some of the designers gave us a Bill of Rights because they felt the Constitution was still too friendly towards the centralization of power (think of tyrants, and in modern-times, think of hidden back doors in your operating system).

Unfortunately, many of our fellow countrymen are easy pushovers and are willing to give up their rights. This includes a large majority of the population, and probably always will. Human beings are primarily herd animals. Too bad. (Note, the country is a republic, "for which it stands." We would have never stood this long as a democracy)

The following is just a short description...

Visit the Fed Reserve Board of SF Money Exhibit

In the mid-1700s, the American colonies had a shortage of precious metal to use for money, so they experimented with printing their own colonial paper money. The money was called Colonial Scrip. The Scrip was simple fiat money. It was printed as needed, and not backed by gold or silver; the same condition we have today. However, the difference between scrip and modern money is that scrip was debt free. Each locality even had its own artwork, like the state quarters we have today.

Benjamin Franklin acted as an agent for Pennsylvania, Georgia, New Jersey, and Massachusetts. In 1757 (and again in 1764), he went to England and lived there for several years. To find out more about Benjamin Franklin, and to read his autobiography, here is a good collection - http://tigger.uic.deu/~rjensen/franklin.htm

While Franklin was in England, officials at the Bank of London asked him what he thought was the reason for the success of the colony.

"That is simple. In the Colonies we issue our own money. It is called Colonial Scrip. We issue it in proper proportion to the demands of trade and industry to make the products pass easily from the producers to the consumers. In this manner, creating for ourselves our own paper money, we control its purchasing power, and we have no interest to pay to no one." - Benjamin Franklin

The bankers apparently didn't like the colonies printing their own interest free money because the British Parliament quickly passed the Currency Act in 1764. The act prohibited colonial officials from issuing their own money. Colonies were ordered to pay future taxes in gold or silver coins.

"In one year, the conditions were so reversed that the era of prosperity ended, and a depression set in, to such an extent that the streets of the Colonies were filled with unemployed."
- Benjamin Franklin

Franklin claims this was the real cause for the War of Independence.

"The colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the colonies their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction. The inability of the colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George III and the international bankers was the prime reason for the Revolutionary War."
- Benjamin Franklin autobiography

Evidently, Franklin had enough of the British. In May of 1775, Franklin returned to Philadelphia and joined up with the Continental Congress.

Taxation had drained the colonies of gold and silver. When the war started, the colonies again started printing fiat money to pay for it. At the beginning of the war, the 'US' had 12 million dollars, but by the end of the war it had 500 million dollars. Common items were priced at thousands of dollars. Printing too much currency had lost its value.

Fiat money worked previously, but only when it was issued in the amounts needed to run commerce.

"the octopus... bankers... practically control both political parties." --New York City Mayor John F. Hylan, 1922 Who are the stockholders in the Fed?

"the biggest men in the U.S. ...are afraid of something. They know... there is a power somewhere so organized... so complete... they had better not speak above their breath ...in condemnation of it." -- President Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom: A Call for the Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People, New York, Doubleday, 1913.

The Federal Reserve tries to manage the money supply with interest rates, to stem the peaks and valleys of a cycle (moneymen harvesting their crop?).

"first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations... will deprive the people of all their property, until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers occupied."
-- Thomas Jefferson, primary author of the U.S. Declaration of Independence.

The Federal Reserve was created in 1913 and sold to Americans as a governmental control tool over the bankers. However, it was used as a tool for the bankers.

"Give me control over a nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws" -- Baron M.A. Rothschild (1744 - 1812)

Monetary Reform Act

From 1900 to 1910, 70 percent of new funds for manufacturing were generated from within corporations. This made corporations more independent of bankers, hence, an income tax was created in 1913. The corporations are a primary target of the income tax. In the 2004 edition of the Code of Federal Regulations, the term "corporation" is found 10,000 times more than "taxpayer" while the term "citizen" is only mentioned 761 times in CFR Title 26 (2004). You can use the eCFR to search for your particular "subject" of interest, e.g. "how to determine taxable income", "excluded income", "eliminated income", "eliminated items", "allocation and apportionment of deductions", etc. J.P. Morgan, who financed other tycoons in America, worked "under the table" for the Bank of England, and so did his father. All of the following; Morgan, B of E, the Rothschilds, especially Cleveland H. Dodge from Kuhn Loeb, and others involved in the Federal Reserve, made Woodrow Wilson President. Wilson pretended to be against the bankers during his campaign, but he was really their tool. In 1907, there was a market crash and Morgan saved us with his money. Wilson was his cheerleader.

70% of new funding for manufacturing was generated from within business. The corporations were there own bankers. This made traditional banking a hardly needed service. The competition and the middle class were taking over.

Traitor or ignorant? Democrat Wilson signed into law the Revenue Act of 1913

"when I as a Democrat resist the concentration of power, I am resisting the processes of death, because the concentration of power is what always precedes the destruction of human initiative, and, ...energy." -- Woodrow Wilson "All this trouble could be averted if we appointed a committee of six or seven public-spirited men like J.P. Morgan to handle the affairs of our country." -- Woodrow Wilson Apparently, Wilson couldn't make up his mind whether to resist the destruction, or to allow the "processes of death" to leach our energy. How sad and embarassing for the United States, President Woodrow 'No Leader' Wilson didn't want to handle the affairs of the country himself. Apparently, he chose to remain ignorant, and was even treasonous for his designs in giving up control of the country, to bankers. Even the title of his "New Freedom: ...Emancipation of the Generous Energies of a People" is just a little suspicious. Taking a percentage of income, by forced volunteerism, is still slavery. The US tax system utilizes the concept of "pay your fair share," but actually the exact opposite is occurring. The reality of our income tax is, "Work more, Owe more," following the communist manifesto - for a graduated income tax. Now interest must be paid for printing and lending money, and we are forced to pay income taxes to cover that interest; modern day slavery.

Income Tax Does Not Pay

"100% of what is collected is absorbed solely by interest on the Federal Debt ... all individual income tax revenues are gone before one nickel is spent on the services taxpayers expect from government"
-- Grace Commission report (PPSS) submitted to President Ronald Reagan on January 15, 1984 (also here). The commission concluded all income tax money goes towards interest on an unnecessary loan.

If income taxes do not pay for government services, which taxes do? What is the real purpose of the Income Tax?

Were there any defenders of freedom?

The father of the famous flyer Lindbergh was a government official in the House of Representatives. Rep. Charles A. Lindbergh saw the tax scam, called it a scam, and warned us that we would be enslaved (Taxwise - currently thats at 1/4 to 1/2 slave and growing towards a European-like 60%).

Lindberghs - both were heros.

"According to Mr. Lindbergh, 'the conspiracy began in' 1906 when the late J.P. Morgan, Paul M. Warburg, a present member of the Federal Reserve Board, the National City Bank and other banking firms 'conspired' to obtain currency legislation in the interest of big business and the appointment of a special board to administer such a law, in order to create industrial slaves of the masses"   - The New York Times, Feb. 12, 1917 (The "industrial slaves" are the high-tech, modern-day slaves of today, you. The whips have been replaced with threats, fines, and imprisonment)

"Those not favorable to the money trust could be squeezed out of business and the people frightened into demanding changes in the banking and currency laws which the Money Trust would frame." -- "From now on, depressions will be scientifically planned and created."
 - Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr.

The money trust gained control, and created their tax slaves. The big question - why were all the other politicians so silent, and why do they remain so silent today? (All government officials will ignore specific tax questions or pass them on to the IRS where they also ignore them. They even call the use of their own rules frivolous, but Florida doesn't seem to have that problem.) Haven't all government officials pledged their allegiance to the Republic for which it stands, the USA?

Apparently, our government officials (politicians) have bilked and sold out their own neighbors. A conspiracy and treason, which continues today, almost 100 years after being warned by Lindbergh. Still, interest is paid on the creation and lending of money, and income taxes are used to pay the interest. And, it is the slaves, which Lindbergh spoke of that pay the interest. This is the same condition, where the Colonies lost power to issue their own printed money that, according to Ben Franklin, brought us to Revolution.

"SUPPORT OUR TROOPS" : began in World War II, 1942. Donald Duck Pays Income Tax "Taxes will keep democracy on the march" Amazing blatant propaganda for war industry. WATCH MOVIE (10MB, Right-Click > Save Link) (Cartoon): You don’t wanna forget our fighting men, do you laddy? Donald: "No, Sir!!!" Then you’ll have to meet your tax payments... Brainwashing by Disney

"Compare this (40% to 75% total local, State and Federal tax rate) to the plight of medieval serfs. They only had to give the lord of the manor a third of their output and they were considered slaves. So what does that make us?" -- Daniel J. Mitchell, Economist History repeats itself constantly. Wars are started by those in the war business. All that is needed is a cause. Just sink a ship, or betray your own fighting men and place them under attack, or blow up some buildings and you've got war, like the latest one for Osame Bin Forgotten. This somehow has become "Hang Saddam!" Someone in the US DOJ or FEMA seemed to have known in 1997 which building would be hit first and the approximate location of the World Trade Center to be hit. What looks to be a blatant inside joke was removed from their own original content, but the web archive still has it. (Yes, the Internet Archive [archive.org] is so handy. You may consider donating to them. What they do is priceless.)

(And here are a few videos you may find interesting - about attacks, war, lies and death.)

Today, Internet sales are tax free. Out-of-state purchases have always been tax free, but 43 states want to tax out-of-state Internet sales. As before, it will start voluntarily, then become, legally or illegally, a mandatory tax.

"The proposal is for the new system to initially be voluntary. 'So (unless) Congress were to act and make this mandatory, there would be no penalties,' says Peterson. But there's a plus for businesses who do adopt the software. The states say the electronic system is so good, they'll designate participating businesses 'audit proof'."
-- News quoting the spokesperson for software company providing for tracking of taxpayers.

And so, a carrot is held out to persuade business owners to become 'audit proof.'

Gold and silver is seen as the answer, and this may be, especially if the following is accurate...

“The abandonment of the gold standard made it possible for the welfare statists to use the banking system as a means to an unlimited expansion of credit…In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. There is no safe store of value.... Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the “hidden” confiscation of wealth…[Gold] stands as a protector of property rights.”
— Alan Greenspan, 1966

Friends and colleagues. But... "The real rulers in Washington are invisible, and excercise power from behind the scenes." -- Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952

Many of us have noticed that both political parties have been moving to the left over the years. The Republicans of today are the Democrats of 30 years ago. The Democrats of today are socialists and this explains why the richest and most powerful, like John Forbes Kerry, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, Kennedy, friends and colleagues, pretend to be for the average and below average. Everything slides towards the left. Socialism and Communism are used, probably because they are the most powerful tools for controlling ignorant herds.

The real rulers stay hidden behind the scenery. They are rarely the subject of the "news," probably because the real rulers display absolutely dispicable behaviours. Look at what was going on with orphan kids in and around the White House before Clinton. The video is no longer available from that link, but here's a link to it, Discovery Channels video "Conspiracy of Silence", from rense.com where Lawyer/Senator John DeCamp shines the light on child molesters inside Government. Over 80 kids came forward. They can't all be lying.

"If one understands that socialism is not a share-the-wealth program, but is in reality a method to consolidate and control the wealth, then the seeming paradox of super-rich men promoting socialism becomes no paradox at all. Instead, it becomes logical, even the perfect tool of power-seeking megalomaniacs. Communism, or more accurately, socialism, is not a movement of the downtrodden masses, but of the economic elite."
 - Gary Allen, author

ANNUIT COEPTIS "God approves our undertakings" NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM "New Order for the Ages"

What is this power so organized and complete that President Wilson said it scared the biggest men in the US? Who are the real rulers that Justice Frankfurter spoke of?

God approved this? Do we have to put up with an All Seeing Spy, for Ages?

It's suspicious that the Federal Reserve came into existence in the same year as the Income Tax in 1913:

"Examining the organization and function of the Federal Reserve Banks... we conclude that the federal reserve are not federal ... but are independent and privately owned and controlled corporations... federal reserve banks are listed neither as 'wholly owned' government corporations [under 31 USC Section 846] nor as 'mixed ownership' corporations [under 31 USC Section 856]"
-- 9th Circuit Court, Lewis vs United States, case #80-5905, June 24, 1982

Evidently, the money men have been at it for awhile...

"I see in the near future a crisis approaching. It unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country... the Money Power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign... by working upon the prejudices of the people, until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the midst of war."
-- President Abraham Lincoln, said to be in a letter written to William Elkin just after the passage of the National Banking Act of 1863 and less than five months before he was assassinated.

"when you realise that the entire system is very easily controlled... you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate."
-- President James Garfield, was assassinated within weeks of release of this statement during first year of his Presidency in 1881. He died of bullet blood poisoning on September 19, two months after he was shot, but some think it was the surgeons' digging around with dirty tools.

"I am a tariff man, standing on a tariff platform."
-- President William McKinley. During McKinley's presidency the Gold Standard Act was passed making gold the standard for all of the nation's currency. A minimum gold reserve was required of the Treasury and the price of gold was set. He pissed-off the bankers, McKinley was assassinated on Sept. 5, 1901, and died 9 days later. His shooter received a "hasty" trial, was found guilty and electrocuted within 2 months from the time of the shooting.

"The Federal Reserve Bank is an institution owned by the stockholding member banks. The Government has not a dollar's worth of stock in it."
-- President Warren Harding, from a 1921 inquiry of the Federal Reserve, investigating concerns of a private banking monopoly. His death was a mystery. Doctors believed he was poisoned, but his wife would not allow an autopsy under the Surgeon General Sawyer's highly unusual recommendation. Soon after beginning his presidency, he called for a reduction of government, curtailing expenses, lowering taxes, a repeal of the wartimes excesses tax, and a national budget system. [Apparently, a world bankers worst nightmare.]

"This year, I authorized the issuance of United State Notes. They are the same appearance except for the heading at the top. The difference is that we pay interest to the Federal Reserve on their notes, whereas we pay no interest on United State Notes."
-- President John Kennedy, he was assassinated 10 days later.

Assuming the quotes are true, President Kennedy also saw the evil forces at work, and like the others tried to stop them. Maybe, that's why he told us, in so many words, we need to get the good old-fashioned militia ["citizens"], and our guns/clubs/knives/rocks ("arms") ready, and, that our first job should be the preservation of freedom and to sacrifice for it.

“Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom.”
— President John F. Kennedy

President Kennedy wasn't worried about foreign invaders fighting the US military, obviously our military would handle such an affair, with little or no problem. Kennedy was warning us about an enemy within, a condition where government officials are just the tip of the iceberg. It sounds like he was about to tell us something else in addition soon after, something more important. It seems Kennedy was about to ask for help in getting rid of a problem. And, it appears to have been a money related problem. (The smartest and bravest Democrat ever, so why do they tend to ignore his advice on self-protection, freedom, and sacrifice.)

Parnoid? Indeed...

"I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies".
-- Thomas Jefferson

President Reagan also knew that concentrated powers were enslaving us. No doubt, Reagan knew Kennedy's quotes and those of all the previous Presidents, very well. He had the same problem that everyone who knows has, he also had an assassination attempt. Maybe it had something to do with the way Ronald Reagan talked...

"Government is not the solution to our problem. Government is the problem."

"The current tax code is a daily mugging"

"I have only one thing to say to the tax increasers. Go ahead - make my day."

"Concentrated power has always been the enemy of liberty."

"The more government takes in taxes, the less incentive people have to work. What coal miner or assembly-line worker jumps at the offer of overtime when he knows Uncle Sam is going to take 60 percent or more of his extra pay?"

"Why is it inflationary if the people keep their own money, and spend it the way they want to, [but] not inflationary if the government takes it and spends it the way it wants to?"
-- Speech at the White House (1981).

"It's time we reduced the federal budget and left the family budget alone."

"Every dollar the Federal Government does not take from us, every decision it does not make for us will make our economy stronger, our lives more abundant, our future more free."
-- President Ronald Reagan

What do other government officials say in public?

“The dirty little secret is that both houses of Congress are irrelevant.” Reich cut to the chase when he said that “America’s domestic policy is now being run by Alan Greenspan and the Federal Reserve and America’s foreign policy is now being run by the International Monetary Fund [IMF].” And, “...when the president decides to go to war, he no longer needs a declaration of war from Congress.”
-- Robert Reich, Bill Clinton’s former Secretary of Labor, in USA Today, January 7, 1999

If true, we've got trouble.

“The United Nations is the greatest fraud in history. Its purpose is to destroy the United States.”
— Former U.S. Congressman John E. Rankin

If true, UP THEIR'S, we must destroy the United Nations, abolish the Fed and stop the IMF.

Real Americans would also find and catch all of the bad guys, imprison them, and get all of their money back, all 90 years worth of "income tax" - with interest. Then, real Americans would abolish this form of slavery, making sure it couldn't happen again.

A system re-design is in order, involving some code updates, but primarily following what is already written in the Constitution (there's alot of good code in there).

An 'Open Source' group of system analysts and designers, working with teams of historians and constitutional law experts, etc, could put together a stronger, longer lasting system.

How can an evil, slave-making force be stopped?

1. Good vs Evil

First, choose your side. Those who sit on the fence and do nothing, and those controlled by fear are only enabling evil. Get some courage, or just go away, and play your role of the victim.

2. Get Educated, Ignorance is Curable

3. Speak the Truth, Live by the Truth.

Show others how to search. If you find something important, tell others. Start a website, it's easy to do. And, as difficult as it may be, try to make your explanations easy enough for a child to understand, they will be the future slaves.

“You need only reflect that one of the best ways to get yourself a reputation as a dangerous citizen these days is to go about repeating the very phrases which our founding fathers used in the struggle for independence.”
-— Charles A. Beard

The phrases have no value if they are unknown. They must be repeated often.

Don't bother telling your local, regional, or national news of your important information. They just make the news, they don't report it. And, they'll just sit on the info. Report your own info, on the Internet.

“In March, 1915, the J.P. Morgan interests, the steel, shipbuilding, and powder interest, and their subsidiary organizations, got together 12 men high up in the newspaper world and employed them to select the most influential newspapers in the United States and sufficient number of them to control generally the policy of the daily press....They found it was only necessary to purchase the control of 25 of the greatest papers. An agreement was reached; the policy of the papers was bought, to be paid for by the month; an editor was furnished for each paper to properly supervise and edit information regarding the questions of preparedness, militarism, financial policies, and other things of national and international nature considered vital to the interests of the purchasers.”
—- U.S. Congressman Oscar Callaway, 1917

“We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto determination practiced in past centuries.”
-— David Rockefeller, founder of the Trilateral Commission, in an address before that organization in June, 1991

We don't know if the two quotes above are accurate, but their information coincides with our experience and troubles getting media attention on the income tax data-mining results.

However, this quote is accurate, and freely confessed by this traitor...

"Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as 'internationalists' and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure - one world, if you will. It that's the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it."
-- David Rockefeller, "Memoirs", 2002, p. 405

Here are some more famous quotes...

"... whenever the Legislators endeavour to take away, and destroy the Property of the People, or to reduce them to Slavery under Arbitrary Power, they put themselves into a state of War with the People, who are thereupon absolved from any farther Obedience ... [Power then] devolves to the People, who have a Right to resume their original Liberty, and, by the Establishment of a new Legislative (such as they shall think fit) provide for their own Safety and Security, which is the end for which they are in Society."
-- John Locke, (1632-1704) English philosopher and political theorist. Considered the ideological progenitor of the American Revolution and who, by far, was the most often non-biblical writer quoted by the Founding Fathers of the USA.

The Solution

This evil mess has already been dealt with, and a solution has already been created. It's called the Constitution and a Bill of Rights. But, like any code, someone has hacked into it, and what is needed are a few code updates ... to strengthen the original code.

The Constitution itself, in Art. 6, says "This Constitution... shall be the supreme Law of the Land, and the Judges in every State shall be bound", and continues on to say that this is so, regardless of any other law. Meaning any federal, state or local law contravening it is invalid. In the United States, the Constitution, established by the People, is deemed superior to laws established by their agents (in Congress). The greedy weaknesses of our agents in Congress, our Presidents, and all in our bureaucracy, are supposed to be bound with the Constitution.

"In questions of power, then, let no more be said of confidence in man, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution".
-- Thomas Jefferson

How then were the agents in Congress allowed to turn fundamental laws and principles around 180-degrees? The People specifically do not allow any tax, direct or indirect, without apportionment.

Due to a lack of concern by almost every one of us over the last 200 years, an infection of ignorance has spread; very few know anything about their government, or even their rights. Our Supreme laws are still being deconstructed, by greedy agents.

Too bad... since many died to get us our rights. Now, all are guilty, and sentenced to a life of slavery.

Isn't this exactly what the Patriots that started this country warned us about? Many famous quotes can be found regarding freedom and the price that must be eternally paid to have freedom. The Founding Fathers knew that taxation was a slave control tool. (And now we have the Patriot Act, which like the name hints, actually serves to destroy our Patriots. To use a threat of war, or some type of danger in order to remove rights and start trouble is nothing new, e.g. Hitler, sinking ships, Waco, etc.). Study some history, and some news. You don't have to read too far back into history before you notice that it always repeats itself.

Learn that you are the master, the boss, and that government officials serve you.

Take a look at your Constitution. Notice that it says "We the people... do ordain."

Take a look at the Bill of Rights (Amendments):

1. Freedom of religion, speech, press, the right of the people to assemble, and petition for redress of grievances.
2. The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.
3. ...without the consent of the Owner...
4. The right of the people to...
5. No person shall be held... nor shall any person be subject... nor... compelled... nor be deprived... nor...
6. the accused shall enjoy the right...

and on...

Aren't these rights designed to protect citizens from their own government?

Of all search results for "tax" in the Constitution and Amendments - there are only 10 results in both - these are the relevant results (supreme laws) provided:

• Art. 1, sec. 2, clause 3: "Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned... excluding Indians not taxed"
• Art. 1, sec. 8, clause 1: "The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes"
• Art. 1, sec. 9, clause 4: "No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census" [Capitation: A yearly tax laid on each person according to his estate and ability.]
• Art. 1, sec. 9, clause 5: "No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State."

These supreme laws were written by the People in the 1780's, but then came the 16th Amendment, created by agents in Congress, in 1913.

• Art. 16 (16th Amendment): "The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment"

Only 'without apportionment' is new in the 16th Amendment, but the Amendment is a 180-degree turn on "We the people." Essentially, this was a treasonous move by our agents in Congress, against us. The agents were specifically told twice before, by the People in the very first Article, that there Shall Be No Taxes without apportionment, or without Proportion to a census. This concept is so important that it occurs twice in the very first class of code, ever written.

But, even the 16th Amendment code functions Constitutionally (nevermind apportionment for a moment) if we examine what is actually declared. The code at this point does not specify beyond "incomes."

Which incomes?

A tax on all incomes was never declared, but the specific sources are prescribed in the Code of Federal Regulations.

Even though the 16th says "from whatever source," implying every income, we know this is not a correct. Many exempt and excluded incomes do exist. (Search for "exempt" and "excluded income" in the tax regs, or search for "eliminated income".)

So, which incomes for the 16th? There should be provided a specific list of taxable items (there is, you may have just looked at it).

The tax laws and regulations, which carryout the 16th Amendment, mention the following incomes:

All Income Any Income Items of Income Gross Income Taxable Income Exempt Income Excluded Income And some other terms of Income. But, those laws and regulations say, "the tax imposed is upon taxable income," not simply "incomes."

The 16th Amendment does not specify which incomes, but the Constitution does and makes it perfectly clear how our taxes are to be produced. The 16th Amendment can only be Constitutional, if the tax on incomes without apportionment, applies just to foreigners and foreign earned income (according to regs in Sec. 911, by the time a citizen has received foreign earned income, he's already been away long enough to be primarily a foreigner), thus keeping the previous Amendments intact and in place.

Congress always had the power to lay on whatever source, but the laws upon: who, where, when, how and what, still need to be Constitutional in construction.

In other words, the 16th Amendment added no new power to tax, which is exactly what the Supreme Court said in cases occurring shortly after the ratification in 1913 (such cases possibly occurred because the first couple of editions of tax regulations did not make it clear who, when, where, how, and what was taxed. Maybe the citizens were even told the tax was not a new tax [it won't affect you, it doesn't apply to you, etc], and for the most part that was true. It's such a familiar communist tactic in some many aspects of life.)

Not until 1918 did income tax regulations indicate that the Constitution still prevents taxing of its citizens...

"Gross income excludes the items of income specifically exempted by the statute and also certain other kinds of income by statute or fundamental law free from tax."
-- Art. 71, 1918 US income tax regulations

Fundamental Law = Constitution, Merriam-Webster OnLine, etc, etc.

Because "certain other kinds" means more than one kind, and we are told so, we should also refer to code in the Constitution. Since the tax rules are based on the Constitution, a multiple exemption that occurs, should be traceable to a code source, in both the rules and Constitution. Only "Indians not taxed" is obvious in the Constitution. But, it must have something else to say that is essential to the matter if there are indeed "certain other kinds" exempted. It must be more carefully examined. See A Visual.

Another interesting historical sidenote: notice that 1918 regulations clearly show the following, but won't make the same statement for any other taxpayer:

Art. 6. The following items should not be included as gross income:

(e) The compensation of all officers and employees of a State or any political subdivision thereof, including public-school teachers, etc. When such State officers or employees are compensated by the United States, they must include such income as taxable.

Even though it appears to be saying so, the code in the 16th Amendment never meant "all incomes" ('income' is not equal to 'all income') and cannot be implemented consistently with fundamental requirements in the Constitution unless applicable only to foreigners and foreign earned income.

Interestingly, the current US tax regs do fulfill the fundamental requirements of the Constitution, that our taxes be proportional to Citizens, that capitation is only allowed by census.

The laws and rules exist specifically to tell us: how, who, when, where, and what is taxed. The issue then, is not about the power to tax incomes, but about [1] taxable income found in the regulations, and [2] the contradicting lack of apportionment in the 16th. What portion of apportionment did agents in Congress not understand in 1913? If fundamentals, like apportionment, and Capitation without Proportion to Census can be changed, then any of it can be changed and the Constitution is already finished (with destruction of property rights for more taxes as one of the nails in the coffin).

CONSTITUTION -

There are two primary problems, in terms of Code or Coding, identified in the supreme laws (Constitution):

1. "No Capitation... unless in Proportion to the Census" -- Art. 1, sec. 9, clause 4
2. "without apportionment" -- Art. 16 (16th Amendment)

1. Many modern law dictionaries will tell you that Capitation is simply a uniform, per person tax. However, a law